Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

There's no end to debate about Montreal's new superhospitals

Susan Pinker
CMAJ April 29, 2003 168 (9) 1171-1171-a;
Susan Pinker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A recent visit to the Department of Cardiology at Montreal's 110-year-old Royal Victoria Hospital says much about why members of the McGill University Health Centre want to build a new superhospital for $2.2 billion.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. The Royal Vic: showing every one of its 110 years Photo by: Susan Pinker

Patients are lined up in the corridor under lethargic ceiling fans. A hand-printed ECG–EKG sign hangs from a water-stained ceiling, held by tape and string. Not to mention the broader issues: long waiting times, an aging infrastructure that hasn't adapted to evolving technologies, and problems attracting staff.

Ten years after the McGill superhospital idea was approved by the university's board and the 5 hospitals involved, the new institution has yet to be built, the estimated cost has ballooned from $850 million to more than $2 billion, and accusations of cronyism, conflict of interest and lack of transparency abound.

And, despite the endorsement of the provincial government, large infusions of cash and the administrative amalgamation of the 5 teaching hospitals in 1997, the public and much of the medical community is still in the dark about what will happen next.

There has never been public consultation on whether a giant hospital that centralizes research and acute and ambulatory care at a single site is a good deal for the community, or whether renovating and recycling some of the 32 existing hospital buildings should be part of the plan.

Now, on the eve of the province's announcement of funding for 2 superhospitals (1 for McGill and another for the Université de Montréal), a rumour is afoot. Insiders say the plan has been scaled back to a more modest project: a smaller building on a new site for emergency and acute care — to be expanded in the future — and the revamping of the 1950s-era Montreal General Hospital as a spruced-up outpatient clinic.

The adjustments, decided behind closed doors, have worried some clinicians and angered others.

“Did you see all the paint that's peeling, the walls that are cracking?” says Dr. Sarkis Meterissian, a surgical oncologist at the Royal Victoria. Arguing that it is impossible to renovate an institution as huge and decrepit as the Royal Vic, Meterissian says he would agree to a phased expansion only if it were “written in stone. Will they expand it, or will it be like ‘the cheque is in the mail.’ Physically, we can't work in the same institution we're in now. Most of us have stayed here because the new hospital is coming. If they decide not to do it, you're going to see an efflux of doctors, and it won't be pretty.”

Multisite institutions can be hard on staff at the best of times, says Dr. Chris Carruthers, who lived through the amalgamation of the 3-campus Ottawa Hospital, where he is vice-president of medical affairs. “In psychiatry, we didn't have the physicians needed for 3 sites, so if you don't [amalgamate at] 1 site, you'll have coverage problems.”

However, some doctors are willing to compromise. “I wouldn't mind a new hospital if we had a billion to spend,” says Dr. Allan Sniderman, Edwards Professor of Cardiology at McGill and former head of cardiology at the Royal Victoria.

But he says there are other options, and rethinking the health delivery system as a whole is more important than new bricks and mortar. Although upset by shortfalls in the system, Sniderman would settle for a revamped outpatient facility “where we could jump-start the process of what real care is.”

Some Montrealers are dead set against a superhospital, let alone the idea of having 2 in the same city. “The government just cut 350 rehabilitation and long-term beds,” says Dr. Paul Saba, a member of the Coalition for Physicians for Social Justice. “Legault [Quebec's health minister] says we're $1.8 billion short just to get our basic services, like family doctors, equipment and home care. A new cement building is not going to attract doctors and nurses who feel underpaid.

“And what is best for patients?” he added. “Access to doctors, emergency services and surgery — we can provide these in the buildings that already exist, but we won't be able to provide them if we bankrupt the system.” — Susan Pinker, Montreal

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 9
29 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
There's no end to debate about Montreal's new superhospitals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
There's no end to debate about Montreal's new superhospitals
Susan Pinker
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (9) 1171-1171-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
There's no end to debate about Montreal's new superhospitals
Susan Pinker
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (9) 1171-1171-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Can Ontario offload surgeries to private clinics without undermining public health care?
  • Should alcohol carry a warning label?
  • Could bringing the hospital home expand acute care capacity?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire