Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
The Left Atrium

Reading and driving

Vincent Hanlon
CMAJ April 29, 2003 168 (9) 1163-1164;
Vincent Hanlon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Driving lessons: exploring systems that make traffic safer J.P. Rothe, editor Edmonton: University of Alberta Press; 2002 343 pp $34.95 (paper) ISBN 0-88864-370-5

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Photo by: Fred Sebastian

My son, in his relatively short driving career, has already caused two rear-end collisions. Fortunately no one was injured in either crash. But once the insurance claims were settled and the new, higher premiums had been paid, I was left with a nagging concern for the safety of my son, a young driver, and for other motorists with whom he shares the roads. I ordered Driving Lessons: Exploring Systems That Make Traffic Safer for him. When it arrived in the mail from The Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research (ACICR), I couldn't help reading it myself.

Editor J. Peter Rothe is senior associate with the ACICR and assistant professor of public health at the University of Alberta. This collection of articles is the result of a project he undertook after the 1998 Alberta Traffic Safety Summit. More than a compilation of conference proceedings, these twenty essays are an attempt at a coherent presentation of the design-systems theory on which the conference was based. Rothe describes it as “a book of alternative thinking, framed within recent cybernetic theory.” In it, the reader will encounter not only cybernetic theory but also discussions of neoliberal ideology, the dialectics of freedom and motion, the “ecology of vulnerability,” “postmodern conceptions of human reengineering” and a few dominant paradigms in need of a good shift.

Contributors include road-safety researchers and engineers, geographers, a designer, psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists, representatives from the Alberta Motor Association, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and a few doctors — among them, the emergency physician and tireless injury-control advocate, Louis Francescutti. The articles are grouped into sections on personal, institutional and technical subsystems. Topics range widely from “Dealing with Stress, Aggression and Pressure in the Vehicle” and “Rural versus Urban Drivers” to “Understanding the Political Basis of Traffic Safety” and “Red Light Cameras.”

According to Rothe, the multidisciplinary approach of cybernetics “helps to distill and clarify ideas and conceptual patterns, opening new pathways of understanding in traffic safety.” Rothe acknowledges the structuralist theories of Lévi-Strauss and their influence on his thinking about road safety. In the context of structuralist anthropology Lévi-Strauss reasoned that “a state of continuing death and injury is a systemic product rather than the product of individual pathology.” In Driving Lessons the recurring message is that the relationships among the phenomena that contribute to traffic safety (or the lack of it) are more important than the individual factors.

Traffic safety is a very big public health problem; some would argue it's the biggest one we have in this country. Jorge Frascara gives an impressive review of mortality and morbidity in his article, “Revisiting Communications and Traffic Safety.” As a direct consequence of our autocentricity and hypermobility, 5000 people a year are killed in Canada and another 200 000 are injured or permanently disabled.

Given these statistics, I asked Rothe why traffic safety does not have a higher profile as a health issue, in the same league as heart disease and cancer. His answer was that we internalize the roadway carnage as part of everyday reality. As a society of drivers, we normalize certain behaviours that, over time, lead to crashes: occasional speeding, ignoring other regulatory signs, lapses of caution, driving under the influence of alcohol or fatigue, driving while socializing, and inattention to necessary vehicle repair.

It was instructive to read this book during BC premier Gordon Campbell's recent fifteen minutes of infamy. His story is a good illustration of the predominant paradigm of the blameworthy driver. Clearly, Mr. Campbell should not drink and drive. At the same time, by focusing so much attention on one individual's blood alcohol level, journalists missed an opportunity to examine some of the more complicated and equally important factors that contribute to what Lawrence P. Lonero (in “Driver Skill”) describes as “safe, mature, efficient and socially responsible use of the roads.”

Under certain conditions it is possible, and reasonable, to blame irresponsible drivers, bad roads, rotten weather, failed technology, and unsafe vehicles. But with all due respect to MADD (whom I support), paradigms of blame are of limited utility to help us understand road crashes or to produce strategies to make road travel safer. In “Driver Identities over the Lifespan,” M. Boyes and P. Litke observe, “While there is only one driver per vehicle (excluding, of course, the back-seat variety), the individual driver is a component of a larger system that includes other drivers on the road, pedestrians and, ultimately, society as a whole. A safe journey requires cooperation at all levels.”

One of the most insightful essays in the collection is “Risky Vehicles, Risky Agents: Mobility and the Politics of Space, Movement and Consciousness” by Peter E. S. Freund and George T. Martin. They explore the “embedded material infrastructure” and the less visible but equally pervasive “social infrastructure” that has grown in the wake of mass motorization. In discussing the “hegemony of the automobile” with regard to the use of public space, they alert us to two emerging, and troubling, trends. The increasing numbers of larger and heavier vehicles creates “an attendant ecology of vulnerability.” This new “ ‘harder’ hyper-automobility” makes increasingly “stressful demands on the consciousness of those who participate in traffic (in any capacity—even as pedestrians). These demands are for constant ‘sobriety.’ (This term is used in the broadest sense, meaning general psychomotor competence.)” A practical consequence of this hardening of the collective fleet is that “When a car collides with an SUV, the driver of the car is thirteen times more likely to be killed than the driver of the SUV.”

Crashworthiness is a relatively recent addition to the lexicon of automobility. When auto dealers use the term to market bigger and beefier trucks and SUVs, they are selling more than personal safety. Freund and Martin write:

The emphasis on the crashworthiness of cars glosses over the fact that the individual car is part of a traffic matrix in which vehicles mix with varying degrees of protection. This way of thinking … is analogous to the logic of an arms race, which would argue that roads will be safe when all softer means of mobility are banished and all that are left are tanks. … Such a Hobbesian traffic condition has obvious social drawbacks, including the fact that it seriously disadvantages traffic participants who are walking, cycling or using relatively light autos.

However, to shift blame for highway carnage from drunk drivers to those who make the “defensive” purchase of an SUV is not likely to be a fruitful strategy. (The need for the future disarmament of our roadways, however, may be less of a science fiction than it seems.) Freund and Martin's key insight is that “There are structural limits to universalizing high social standards of self-regulation. These systemic limits constitute the boundaries of accident prevention techniques, which focus on individual behaviour.” So-called driver improvement initiatives, be they the modification of driver behaviours involving the use of alcohol or cell phones, or the attenuation of consumer desires for bigger and more powerful vehicles, can only ever be partial solutions. Freund and Martin conclude:

It is not so much that the present safety orthodoxy is wrong but that its focus on technical and individual interventions leaves collective and structural factors unaddressed … . At its root, much of the roadway-safety issue centers on a competition for the most desirable socio-material space of daily mobility — the built environments created to provide people with channels for access to sites where they work, shop and live.

Yes, Gordon Campbell should not be allowed to pour his own martinis. And we are probably safer if he doesn't drive an SUV. And yes, my son should take some additional safe driving and crash avoidance training. Both of them should read Driving Lessons.

Vincent Hanlon Emergency Physician Lethbridge, Alta.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 9
29 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reading and driving
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reading and driving
Vincent Hanlon
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (9) 1163-1164;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Reading and driving
Vincent Hanlon
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (9) 1163-1164;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

The Left Atrium

  • On becoming
  • Chronicles of a cardiologist in Canada's North
  • Rethinking randomized controlled trials
Show more The Left Atrium

book review

  • Ethics and education
  • A psychiatric reformation
  • Culinary dissection
Show more book review

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire