Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Cocaine-associated chest pain in the emergency department

John Hoey
CMAJ April 15, 2003 168 (8) 1017;
John Hoey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Weber JE, Shofer FS, Larkin GL, Kalaria AS, Hollander JE. Validation of a brief observation period for patients with cocaine-associated chest pain. N Engl J Med 2003;348:510-7.

Background: Through its pharmacologic effect at α- and β-adrenergic receptors, cocaine is thought to increase the oxygen demand of the myocardium by increasing blood pressure and heart rate and to reduce oxygen delivery by producing coronary spasm. Thus, it is not surprising that cocaine use may account for up to 25% of cases of acute myocardial infarction among patients 18 to 45 years of age. For patients who have not recently used cocaine and who present to the emergency department with chest pain but have a low risk for cardiovascular events, 12-hour observation periods have been shown to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to hospital admission. However, no criteria have been identified to date that allow cocaine users who present to the emergency department with chest pain to be safely and rapidly discharged.

Question: Is a 12-hour observation period in a chest-pain observation unit followed by discharge a safe option for patients with cocaine-associated chest discomfort who are at low risk of cardiovascular events ?

Design: From 1998 to 2000, 344 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who presented to an emergency department with chest pain and who either reported use of cocaine during the week before presentation or tested positive for cocaine were evaluated. Forty-two of these patients were directly admitted to hospital and were excluded from the study because they were at high risk of a cardiovascular event (ischemia or acute myocardial infarction suggested on initial electrocardiogram, elevated serum levels of cardiac markers, recurrent ischemic chest pain or hemodynamic instability). The remaining 302 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. They were monitored for 9 to 12 hours in the emergency department's chest-pain observation unit, then discharged and contacted again at least 30 days later to determine their outcomes.

Results: Patients were typically male (66%), black (70%) and tobacco users (84%); the mean age was 38 years. Cocaine use was self-reported by 247 of the 302 patients; all of the others tested positive for cocaine metabolites in their urine. Of those who reported cocaine use, most (203) had inhaled “crack” cocaine; other routes were nasal insufflation (“snorting”) (51), intravenous injection (10) or a combination of methods. Of the 247 who reported cocaine use, 96% (237) said they had used it in the week before presentation and 68% (169) within 24 hours before presentation.

During the 12-hour observation period, ASA and nitrates were given to 93% and 90% of the patients respectively and benzodiazepines to 30%. None was given fibrinolytic agents. Initially, as per the study protocol, all patients underwent stress testing and had a cardiology consultation after 9 hours of observation; later in the study, stress testing became optional. A total of 158 of the 302 patients underwent stress testing before discharge.

Follow-up information was obtained for 300 of the patients. There were no deaths from cardiovascular causes. Four of the patients had had a nonfatal myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up period. Two of them had undergone stress testing during the study observation period: one had had an abnormal test result and was found to have nonocclusive disease by means of cardiac catheterization, and the other had had an indeterminate stress test result followed by a normal result on subsequent dipyridamole sestamibi scanning. All 4 had continued to use cocaine during the follow-up period. Of the 42 people who had been directly admitted to hospital and were considered to be at high risk of a cardiovascular event (excluded from the study), 20 received a diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome.

Commentary: This prospective study, with a defined protocol and almost complete follow-up information, provides good evidence that an observation period of 9 to 12 hours that includes continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring, measurement of cardiac troponin I levels, an optional stress test and an obligatory cardiac consultation before discharge is efficient in distinguishing between patients who need to be admitted and those who can be safely discharged with appropriate follow-up.

Practice implications: Because chest pain is a frequent problem among patients using cocaine who present to emergency departments, establishment of a 12-hour observation protocol in emergency departments would provide a safe, cost-effective alternative to hospital admission for cocaine users with chest pain who are at low to intermediate risk of a cardiovascular event.

John Hoey CMAJ

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 8
15 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cocaine-associated chest pain in the emergency department
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Cocaine-associated chest pain in the emergency department
John Hoey
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (8) 1017;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Cocaine-associated chest pain in the emergency department
John Hoey
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (8) 1017;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (3)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Zollinger–Ellison syndrome
  • Benign splenic regrowth mistaken as recurrent renal cell carcinoma
  • Plastic bronchitis in a 3-year-old boy
Show more Practice

In the Literature

  • Does the choice of β-blocker affect outcome in chronic heart failure?
  • Bisphosphonates and skeletal morbidity in patients with metastatic cancer
  • ACE inhibition in stable coronary artery disease
Show more In the Literature

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Emergency medicine
    • Cardiology: ischemic heart disease
    • Addiction medicine

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire