Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Editorial

The Romanow reforms: add to shopping cart

CMAJ April 01, 2003 168 (7) 821;
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Prime Minister Chrétien and his minister of finance did more than browse the Romanow report1 in preparing the new federal budget: they selected almost everything in it — from compassionate leave to MRI scanners to exercise enticements — for their shopping basket. An arrangement for delivery — the newly forged First Ministers' Accord on Health Care Renewal — has been made with the provincial and territorial premiers: it won't be free, nor does it have a money-back warranty, but at least the shipment can be tracked. For there are strings attached to the federal government's 5-year, $34.8-billion health care spree: the funds must be used for the purposes intended, and there must be an annual reporting on progress. Although we might quibble about whether some of this money is new or repackaged, prima facie it represents a 31% increase over current total spending (public and out-of-pocket) on health care in Canada. If directed funding and an insistence on accountability do the trick, most physicians and patients ought to see tangible evidence of the new federal purchases in their offices, clinics, emergency and radiology departments and home care services over the next 5 years.

The string attached to the largest chunk of federal cash, the Health Reform Fund ($16 billion, or 46%), is the requirement that funds be used to institute multidisciplinary reforms to primary health care, expand home care services and relieve the burden of catastrophic drug costs. Of these, primary care reform will have the greatest impact on the practice of medicine and will probably receive the greatest proportion of the funds. We ought to pay close attention to the almost literal reading of Romanow in the federal government's designation of funds for “multidisciplinary primary health care organizations or teams, with a goal of ensuring that at least half of the population within each jurisdiction has access to an appropriate health care provider 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.”2

A shortage of nurses, not physicians

Clearly, Romanow does not subscribe to the belief that there is a shortage of physicians. The crisis, as he sees it, is in nursing: too few are graduating to replenish an aging workforce, too many are dissatisfied with working conditions, and scope-of-practice issues remain contentious. Thus, we should not be surprised if the $90 million allocated in the federal budget for “health human resources planning and coordination” is devoted mainly to remedying the nursing crisis.

Romanow attributed the difficulty that many Canadians have in finding a family physician (15%, according to a recent survey by the College of Family Physicians of Canada3) to 2 factors: maldistribution, and scope of practice. The difficulty of recruiting and retaining physicians in rural and remote areas is well known; on this problem, the Romanow report offered few new insights, and the federal budget no specifically designated cash. On the scope-of-practice issue, Romanow was succinct and blunt: health professionals, he wrote, “tend to protect their scopes of practice. Each profession appears willing to take on more responsibilities, but is unwilling to relinquish some duties to other professions.”4 The reforms that the government has budgeted for may be destined to change this. As funds for multidisciplinary primary care teams start to flow to Rimouski, Renfrew and Red Deer, physicians — particularly family physicians — should expect increasing pressure to work with other health care professionals, mainly nurses, in the 24/7 delivery of services. And, as there is no commitment to providing more family physicians, those already in practice will have to consider restricting their scope of practice to areas where their particular expertise is most needed, allowing nurses and others to take on expanded roles.

A sharper focus

Meeting the challenge will require a careful and dispassionate assessment of the role of family medicine, the dwindling specialty.4,5,6 It is already difficult to recruit physicians into family medicine, as this year's CaRMS match illustrates (see News, p. 881).7 As nurses are encouraged with federal dollars to expand their roles in primary care, family physicians will need to re-examine theirs. Family physicians may be facing a choice between blurring or sharpening their roles. Will family medicine become an eroded and dissatisfied specialty, or will it renew itself through redefinition, ensuring that the diagnostic and clinical skills of family doctors are put to their best, and more efficient, use? — CMAJ

References

  1. 1.↵
    Romanow RJ. Building on values: the future of health care in Canada. Saskatoon: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002.
  2. 2.↵
    Department of Finance, Government of Canada. Budget 2003, ch. 3. Investing in Canada's health care system. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2003. Available: www.fin.gc.ca/budget03/bp/bpc3e.htm (accessed 2003 Mar 5).
  3. 3.↵
    College of Family Physicians of Canada. 4.5 million Canadians not able to get a family physician [news release]. 2002 Nov 7. Available: www.cfpc.ca/communications/newsreleases/nr06november2002.asp (accessed 2003 Mar 5).
  4. 4.↵
    Rosser WW. The decline of family medicine as a career choice. CMAJ 2002;166(11):1419-20.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Woodburn BD. Family medicine in decline? [letter]. CMAJ 2002;167(8):845.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Lofsky S. Family medicine in decline? [letter]. CMAJ 2002;167(8):845.
  7. 7.↵
    Sullivan P. Family medicine crisis? Field attracts smallest-ever share of residency applicants. CMAJ 2003;168(7):881-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 7
1 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Romanow reforms: add to shopping cart
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Romanow reforms: add to shopping cart
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (7) 821;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The Romanow reforms: add to shopping cart
CMAJ Apr 2003, 168 (7) 821;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • A shortage of nurses, not physicians
    • A sharper focus
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • “Less is better” is the best message when talking to patients about alcohol
  • Nouvelle politique sur l’utilisation des outils d’intelligence artificielle dans les manuscrits soumis au JAMC
  • Without more acute care beds, hospitals are on their own to grapple with emergency department crises
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health economics
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire