Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

The primacy of primary care: reading Romanow

CMAJ January 21, 2003 168 (2) 141;
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

For Roy Romanow, primary care is not merely a category of services. It is a doctrine. Primary care is “a preferred approach,” he writes,1 and “[t]he objective of moving ahead with primary care is nothing short of transforming Canada's health care system.” Mr. Romanow's definition of primary care is almost as amorphous as his vision is grand, and he makes no clear delineation of the overlapping territory of primary care as family practice and primary care as public health. Rather, we are offered broad statements such as “Primary care is about fundamental change across the entire health care system.”

In its emphasis on prevention and the determinants of health, Romanow's report follows the tradition of the WHO declaration of “Health for All” at the Alma Ata conference of 1978, in which the definition of “primary care” was expanded to embrace public health programs such as health eduction, sanitation and immunization.2 For many Canadians, however, the locus of primary care is still the family physician's office. As Romanow discovered, we still want “strong and accessible primary health care services, and … a long-lasting and trusting relationship with a health care professional.” Family physicians say their greatest satisfaction comes from direct contact with patients and from the practical application of their clinical skills. And it is this direct, personal and practical relationship that patients seem to want from their family doctors. So why are many family physicians “dispirited”?3 Why are medical students choosing other specialties? Why are so many Canadians without a family doctor?

The erosion of the prestige of family medicine is spelled out in both the Romanow and the Kirby4 reports: increasing specialization; the proliferation of new technologies; a focus on hospital care; and, we would add, the increasing sophistication of health care “consumers.” (“If colonoscopy is recommended for screening, then why can't I just go directly to a gastroenterologist?”) Our health system has evolved in a way that places the primary emphasis not on primary care, but on the hospital and the specialist. As a consequence, family physicians have become specialists in gatekeeping. They are given ultimate responsibility — “Follow up with your family doctor” — but not the resources or the credit to match. Too much of their time outside the examining room is spent managing the logistics of referrals — everything from home care to getting an early CT scan. And yet, family practice is arguably the most complex of all the medical specialties. It requires the broadest sweep of knowledge, an ability to “separate common non-specific complaints from significant illness,”5 and an ability to relate well with patients and to work effectively with a wide range of other health professionals.

Firmly embedded in Romanow's tall order for primary care reform — 24/7 access to services outside the emergency department, the integration of information through electronic health records, and the elimination of wasteful redundancies — is the need for continuity of care. Enter the case manager, whose primary responsibility is to help patients navigate through “a maze of services and providers.” Until now, this role has typically been performed by a family physician and a nurse. Romanow suggests that a medical or nursing qualification is not necessary for case management, provided that “access to required medical or nursing services” is not impeded. But will adding another level to an already cumbersome system be helpful? Is the solution perhaps more obvious: a lower physician–patient ratio, and more resources for administrative support?6 It is an interesting irony that the holistic part of family practice, the traditional cradle-to-grave role of keeping in one's medical sights the patient as a complex individual in a complex social context, is becoming untenable. Is this really a transition that family physicians want to accept?

There is no single roadmap for the effective delivery of primary care: what is needed in downtown Saskatoon will be different from what is needed in Ile-à-la-Crosse. But Romanow hopes that a designated funding transfer ($1.5 billion for new initiatives) will persuade the provinces to bump primary care to the front of the reform queue. Rather than starting more pilot projects, he urges, we need to implement innovations now: “The desire for perfection is also an obstacle to change.” Certainly, reaffirming primary care as the focus of our health care system — and, with it, the central role of the family physician — is plain common sense. The alternative is to watch our patients wander in a health care system stretched so thin that falling through its cracks becomes inevitable. — CMAJ

References

  1. 1.↵
    Romanow RJ. Primary health care and prevention. In: Building on values: the future of health care in Canada. Saskatoon: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002. p. 115-35.
  2. 2.↵
    World Health Organization. Health for all: origins and mandate. Available: www.who.int/archives/who50/en/health4all.htm (accessed 2002 Dec 16).
  3. 3.↵
    Sullivan P, Buske L. Results from the CMA's huge 1998 physician survey point to a dispirited profession. CMAJ 1998;159(5):525-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. The health of Canadians: the federal role. Final report on the state of the health care system in Canada. Ottawa: 2002. Available: www.parl.gc.ca/37/2/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/soci-e/rep-e/repoct02vol6-e.htm (accessed 2002 Dec 16).
  5. 5.↵
    Rosser WW. The decline of family medicine as a career choice. CMAJ 2002; 166 (11):1419-20.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Kilpatrick K. Clinic beats Romanow to the primary care punch. CMAJ 2003;168(2):210.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 2
21 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The primacy of primary care: reading Romanow
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The primacy of primary care: reading Romanow
CMAJ Jan 2003, 168 (2) 141;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The primacy of primary care: reading Romanow
CMAJ Jan 2003, 168 (2) 141;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Finding time
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Les répercussions des compressions budgétaires de l’AMC sur le Groupe JAMC
  • The impact of CMA budget cuts on CMAJ Group
  • L’intégration de la pratique sage-femme au Canada
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health economics
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire