Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Why choose ophthalmology?

Duncan Anderson and Ken Romanchuk
CMAJ May 27, 2003 168 (11) 1396-1396-a;
Duncan Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Romanchuk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In a “Pulse” article earlier this year,1 Patrick Sullivan hypothesized that “Because the number of call hours can seriously hamper family and other activities, it is probably no coincidence that specialties with less onerous call schedules, such as dermatology and ophthalmology, tend to be oversubscribed in annual residency matches.” However, he presented no statistical information to justify this theory.

In the CMA's annual Physician Resource Questionnaire for 2002,2 only 40 ophthalmologists were surveyed. Of these, approximately 20% had more than 180 hours of call per month;2 this is only slightly less than the 25% of surgical specialists with this level of call reported by Sullivan.1

According to statistics from the Canadian Resident Matching Service, the ratio of the number of applicants whose first choice of specialty was ophthalmology to the number of spaces available was approximately 2:1 for 1998 to 2002.3 Cardiac surgery, diagnostic radiology, emergency medicine, plastic surgery and dermatology had similar ratios over the same period. Yet the on-call duties of the first 4 specialties in this list are also onerous, at least from what we have observed in our centres. The “oversubscription” Sullivan describes is therefore more likely a result of the number of residency positions in the smaller specialties being too low in relation to societal needs.

We suspect that the popularity of ophthalmology is determined by a variety of factors, such as interest in the specialty, advances in treatment, and perceived benefit to patients and society, rather than on-call duties.

Duncan Anderson President Ken Romanchuk Chair Specialty Committee in Ophthalmology Canadian Ophthalmological Society Ottawa, Ont.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Sullivan P. On-call duties total over 7.5 days a month for 25% of surgeons. CMAJ 2003;168 (1):80.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Martin S. More hours, more tired, more to do: results from the CMA's 2002 Physician Resource Questionnaire. CMAJ 2002; 167 (5): 521-2. Tabular data available: www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/167/5/521/DC1 (accessed 2003 Apr 29).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    CaRMS Statistics: archives of match statistics. In: Canadian Resident Matching Service Web site [Internet]. Ottawa: The Service; 2002 Apr 25. Available: www.carms.ca/stats/stats_index.htm (accessed 2003 Apr 30).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 11
27 May 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why choose ophthalmology?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Why choose ophthalmology?
Duncan Anderson, Ken Romanchuk
CMAJ May 2003, 168 (11) 1396-1396-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Why choose ophthalmology?
Duncan Anderson, Ken Romanchuk
CMAJ May 2003, 168 (11) 1396-1396-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health economics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire