MDs mostly mum on Iraq ====================== * Brad Mackay The controversial US-led war in Iraq has generated a groundswell of debate across all levels of Canadian society. But for David Morley, executive director of Doctors Without Borders Canada, the response from physicians has been “muted.” “It's like people across the country have been just waiting and watching,” he says. Still, the organization's international parent, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), has for months had a waiting list of members willing to head to the Middle East. The list includes 3 Canadians, 1 of whom, New Brunswick FP Joni Guptill, left to work in a Syrian outpatient clinic in early April. A month earlier, nonpartisan MSF sent 6 doctors to a Baghdad hospital to deliver supplies and assist in treatment. Those efforts were suspended after 2 of the physicians disappeared briefly in early April. “It's getting harder and harder to help,” Morley said. “Now, as the war seems to be winding down, we are concerned about the independence of humanitarian assistance.” Dr. Joanna Santa Barbara of Hamilton, president of Physicians for Global Survival (Canada), said its members tried to take an activist approach. “It's extremely important for us as doctors to express an opinion on this,” she said. “We felt like we had access to knowledge about health effects that we in particular could present to the general public.” Unlike MSF, her organization has not tried to remain neutral. A statement issued Jan. 15, 2003, stated: “We are opposed to this war, and therefore call on the Canadian government not to provide military, material or moral support for it.” “I think that political or diplomatic decisions often have a direct impact on health, but they're often made by people who have great difficulty imagining that their decision may mean a baby dying of diarrhea — and not 1 baby, but 10 000 babies,” says Santa Barbara. “So it's physicians or the health workers who can help redefine this and put it into health terms for politicians and ordinary people.” Dr. Donald Payne, the Toronto psychiatrist who heads Amnesty International's Medical Network, says it has been difficult to criticize the war because the US was involved. “This is another issue that has tended to polarize people as being for or against the USA, rather than focusing on the issues of human rights and international law.” Dr. David Swann, a Calgary physician who recently went on a month-long humanitarian mission to Iraq, adds that “we've had a tough go in terms of popular support out here.” On the other side of the issue, Dr. Noel Hershfield, a columnist for *Alberta Doctors' Digest*, was angered by marchers who protested against the war but not against “psychopathic suicide bombers” or Saddam Hussein. “My diagnosis is that these well-meaning folks have defects in their brains,” he wrote. — *Brad Mackay*, Toronto ![Figure1](http://www.cmaj.ca/https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/168/10/1307.2/F1.medium.gif) [Figure1](http://www.cmaj.ca/content/168/10/1307.2/F1) Figure. **Bodies in the morgue of Baghdad's al-Kindi Hospital, Apr. 8, 2003** Photo by: Canapress