Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for Canadian Physicians
    • Current Certified CPD Articles
    • Subscribe to email alerts
    • Subscribe to CMAJ print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Email alerts
    • Subscribe to email alerts
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2025
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for Canadian Physicians
    • Current Certified CPD Articles
    • Subscribe to email alerts
    • Subscribe to CMAJ print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Email alerts
    • Subscribe to email alerts
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2025
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Follow CMAJ on BlueSky
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Research

Factors influencing childhood influenza immunization

Vincent J. Grant, Nicole Le Saux, Amy C. Plint, Rhonda Correll, Isabelle Gaboury, Edward Ellis and Theresa W.S. Tam
CMAJ January 07, 2003 168 (1) 39-41;
Vincent J. Grant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Le Saux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy C. Plint
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rhonda Correll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Gaboury
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Ellis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa W.S. Tam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

FOLLOWING THE LAUNCH OF A PUBLICLY FUNDED influenza immunization program for all residents of Ontario over the age of 6 months, we evaluated 203 parents of children who presented to our emergency department between January and March of the following year (2001). Overall, 54 (27%) of the children had been vaccinated. Parents of non-immunized children were more likely to believe that immunization resulted in a flu-like illness (42% v. 17%; p = 0.001), caused side effects that were more severe than having influenza (36% v. 17%; p = 0.010) and weakened the immune system (52% v. 24%; p < 0.001). Parents of both immunized and non-immunized children incorrectly identified gastrointestinal symptoms as symptoms of influenza. The primary reason for deciding against immunization was the belief that their child was not at risk. After adjustment, children with a chronic disease were more likely than those without a chronic disease to be immunized (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–12.6). Children of parents who discussed immunization with a physician were more likely to be immunized than those who had not discussed immunization with a physician (OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.4–19.2).

More than 20%–30% of children are infected annually with influenza.1,2 The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization currently recommends annual immunization of all people 6 months of age or older who are at increased risk of influenza- related complications.3 Vaccination of healthy children is effective and decreases the spread of the disease in schools and the community.1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9

During the 2000/01 influenza season, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care sponsored a universal program of publicly funded influenza immunization for all people in Ontario over the age of 6 months. We felt this was an opportunity to explore factors that influence parents in the decision to immunize their children against influenza.

Between January and March 2001, a convenience sample of parents of Ontario children presenting to the emergency department (ED) of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario were surveyed. After written consent was obtained, a piloted standardized survey was administered by study personnel. Open and closed questions in French or English identified demographic characteristics, parental knowledge of influenza illness and immunization, and factors influencing decisions on immunization. The parents of a parallel subset of all children 6 months of age and older presenting to the ED were surveyed for immunization status alone. Univariate comparisons were conducted using 𝛘2 analysis, Fisher's exact test and risk ratio with a level of significance of α = 0.05. A logistic regression model was constructed that included all 7 factors that were thought might influence the influenza immunization decision. No variable-selection techniques were employed.

A total of 203 (97%) of 208 parents agreed to participate in the study. Overall, 54 (27%) of 203 children had received the influenza immunization in the 2000/01 influenza season. In the parallel subset of 8679 children, 1813 (21%) were also immunized (p = 0.06).

There were no differences between immunized children and nonimmunized children in terms of age (p = 0.16), sex (p = 0.75), daycare attendance (p = 1.00), parental education level (mother p = 0.49; father p = 1.00) or final ED diagnosis (p = 0.66). Children who had received an influenza immunization in the past (relative risk [RR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–4.2) and children with immunized family members (RR 7.5, 95% CI 3.7–15.1) were more likely to be immunized. Knowledge of influenza illness was similar among parents of immunized and nonimmunized children. Of the parents, 119 (58%) incorrectly identified vomiting and diarrhea as symptoms of influenza illness. Parents of nonimmunized children were more likely than those of immunized children to believe that influenza-like illness was a side effect of the immunization (42% v. 17%; p = 0.001), that side effects of the influenza immunization are worse than the illness itself (36% v. 17%; p = 0.010) and that influenza immunization could weaken the immune system (52% v. 24%; p < 0.001).

The 2 most common reasons for immunization were the belief that immunization prevents influenza (54% [29/54]) and that a physician had recommended it (39% [21/54]). The most common reason against immunization was the belief that their child was not at risk (38% [56/149]).

Of all parents, 57% (166/202) had discussed influenza immunization with a physician, and of these only 57% (64/112) received a recommendation for immunization. When immunization was not recommended, 96% (46/48) of children did not receive immunization. Of the parents who had not discussed immunization with a physician, 87% (75/86) of these children did not receive immunization.

Results of the logistic regression analysis of factors potentially associated with the decision to immunize are presented in Fig. 1. Having a chronic disease (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.8–12.6) and discussing immunization with a physician (OR = 6.8, 95% CI 2.4–19.2) both significantly influenced parental decisions to have their child immunized.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 1: Crude and adjusted odds ratios for factors potentially influencing parents' decisions regarding influenza immunization of their.

The main limitation of this study is that the survey was administered to parents of children visiting the ED of a tertiary care pediatric hospital and may not represent parents of children in the general population who do not seek care at similar institutions. It is, however, the only dedicated ED for children in the region, and more than 50% of visits are for non-urgent care.

In our survey, about 25% of eligible children were vaccinated. This is comparable to provincial data for the 2000/01 influenza season, which showed an estimated immunization coverage of 20.4% for the 0- to 4-year age group and 30.2% for the 5- to 18-year age group (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care: personal communication, June 2002). Our rates are also in keeping with data from other populations10,11,12,13,14 and other optional vaccines.15,16

Our results suggest that parents have gaps in knowledge concerning influenza illness and immunization. Many parents believed that influenza manifests as gastrointestinal symptoms. This belief may cause parents to think that diarrhea or vomiting temporally associated with a vaccination is a sign of vaccine failure. As well, 40% of the parents of nonimmunized children felt that their children were not at risk of disease. In fact, children are often the “epicentre” of influenza outbreaks and can become very ill. These 2 issues should be emphasized in education campaigns.

In our study, logistic regression analysis revealed that children whose parents discussed influenza immunization with a physician were 7 times more likely than those whose parents did not discuss immunization to be vaccinated. This underscores the pivotal role of the physician in the promotion of immunization.10,11,15 Why immunization was not recommended in 43% of cases is not known; the only contraindications to vaccination for children 6 months of age or older are previous anaphylaxis to the vaccine and allergy to eggs or other vaccine components.17

Although the costs and benefits of universal influenza immunization remain widely debated, public health and primary care physicians may find our findings useful in planning future influenza immunization campaigns.18,19,20

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

    Contributors: Drs. Grant, Le Saux, Plint, Ellis and Tam and Ms. Correll conceived and designed the study. Drs. Grant, Le Saux, Plint and Ms. Correll collected and assembled the data. Drs. Grant and Le Saux and Ms. Gaboury analyzed and interpreted the data. Ms. Gaboury provided statistical expertise. Dr. Grant drafted the article. All authors provided critical revision for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Estee Marczinski and our emergency department volunteers for help with data collection; David Moher and Nick Barrowman from the Thomas C. Chalmers Centre for Systematic Reviews for their guidance and helpful suggestions; Ann Walker and the Child and Youth Clinical Trials Network for assistance with the survey tool, data entry and analysis.

    This research was supported by a grant from the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute.

    Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Neuzil KM, Zhu Y, Griffin MR, Edwards KM, Thompson JM, Tollefson SJ, Wright PF. Burden of interpandemic influenza in children younger than 5 years: a 25 year prospective study. J Infect Dis 2002;185:147-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Glezen WP, Taber LH, Frank AL, Gruber WC, Piedra PA. Influenza virus infections in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:1065-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Statement on influenza vaccination for the 2001-2002 season. Can Commun Dis Rep 2001;27(ACS-4):1-24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Gruber WC. Children as a target for immunization. In: Nicholson KG, Webster RG, Hay AJ, editors. Textbook of influenza. London: Blackwell Science; 1998. p. 435-44.
  5. 5.↵
    Piedra PA, Glezen WP. Influenza in children: epidemiology, immunity, and vaccines. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 1991;2:140-6.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    White T, Lavoie S, Nettleman MD. Potential cost savings attributable to influenza vaccination of school-aged children. Pediatrics 1999;103:e73.
  7. 7.↵
    Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, Shay DK, Davis RL, DeStefano F, et al. Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children. N Engl J Med 2000;342:232-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Neuzil KM, Mellen BG, Wright PF, Mitchel EF, Griffin MR. The effect of influenza on hospitalizations, outpatients visits and course of antibiotics in children. N Engl J Med 2000;342:225-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Hurwitz ES, Haber M, Chang A, Shope T, Teo S, Ginsberg M, et al. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination of day care children in reducing influenza- related morbidity among household contacts. JAMA 2000;284:1677-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Findlay PF, Gibbons YM, Primrose WR, Ellis G, Downie G. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination: patient perceptions. Postgrad Med J 2000;76:215-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Nichol KL, Hauge M. Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:189-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Krieger JW, Castorina JS, Walls ML, Weaver MR, Ciske S. Increasing influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates: a randomized controlled study of a senior center-based intervention. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:123-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Ipp M, Macarthur C, Winders P, Gold R. Influenza vaccination of high-risk children: a survey of three physician groups. Can J Public Health 1998;89:415-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Walls C. Reasons that healthcare workers decline influenza vaccination in a New Zealand hospital environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21: 249-50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Freeman VA, Freed GL. Parental knowledge, attitudes, and demand regarding a vaccine to prevent varicella. Am J Prev Med 1999;17:153-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Impicciatore P, Bosetti C, Schiavio S, Pandolfini C, Bonati M. Mothers as active partners in the prevention of childhood diseases: maternal factors related to immunization status of preschool children in Italy. Prev Med 2000;31:49-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Influenza vaccine. In: Canadian Immunization Guide. 5th ed. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1998. Cat no H49-8 /1998E. p. 103-10.
  18. 18.↵
    Schabas RE. Mass influenza vaccination in Ontario: A sensible move. CMAJ 2001; 164(1):36-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Demicheli V. Mass influenza vaccination in Ontario: Is it worthwhile? CMAJ 2001; 164(1):38-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Iwane MK, Schwartz B. Pediatric influenza immunization: should healthy children be vaccinated? Pediatr Ann 2001;30(6):354-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 168, Issue 1
7 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors influencing childhood influenza immunization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
Please verify that you are a real person
Citation Tools
Factors influencing childhood influenza immunization
Vincent J. Grant, Nicole Le Saux, Amy C. Plint, Rhonda Correll, Isabelle Gaboury, Edward Ellis, Theresa W.S. Tam
CMAJ Jan 2003, 168 (1) 39-41;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Factors influencing childhood influenza immunization
Vincent J. Grant, Nicole Le Saux, Amy C. Plint, Rhonda Correll, Isabelle Gaboury, Edward Ellis, Theresa W.S. Tam
CMAJ Jan 2003, 168 (1) 39-41;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Parental reasons for non-uptake of influenza vaccination in young at-risk groups: a qualitative study
  • Improving influenza immunisation for high-risk children and adolescents
  • Influenza in children
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research

  • Rate of incident dementia and care needs among older adults with new traumatic brain injury: a population-based cohort study
  • Cardiovascular risk thresholds for intensifying primary care encounter frequency for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a target trial emulation
  • Changes in driving distance to specialist physicians in the era of virtual care: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada
Show more Research

Research letter

  • Neonatal exposure to active pulmonary tuberculosis in a health care professional
  • How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors
  • Predictive value of a self-reported history of varicella infection in determining immunity in adults
Show more Research letter

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Infectious diseases
    • Pediatrics
    • Vaccination

Get the latest content from Canada's leading medical journal, free to all physicians. 

Click to sign up for CMAJ or JAMC email alerts.

Dr Careers logo
View all jobs >(this link will open in a new window) Post a job >(this link will open in a new window)

Latest Jobs

  • Orthopedic Hand Surgeon
    Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
  • Clinician Scientist, Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
  • Pathologist
    Stouffville, Ontario
  • Hospitalist
    Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario
  • Pediatric General & Thoracic Surgeon
    Toronto, Ontario
  • Adult and Pediatric Cardiologists
    Oshawa/Bowmanville, Ontario

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Email alerts
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • About CMAJ
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Equity Audit & Report
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2025, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup{at}cmaj.ca

  • CMA
  • Civility,
  • Accessibility,
  • Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire