Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Occupational and environmental exposure

Lynn Marshall, Erica Weir, Alan Abelsohn and Margaret D. Sanborn
CMAJ October 01, 2002 167 (7) 744-746;
Lynn Marshall
* † ‡ §
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Weir
* † ‡ §
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Abelsohn
* † ‡ §
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret D. Sanborn
* † ‡ §
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Michael Schweigert for his attention to our article1 and for raising some interesting questions. Our primary intent was to suggest organizing principles to aid the physician in taking a comprehensive environmental history. We also wished to illustrate the weighing of evidence and a precautionary approach to guide decision-making in the many (if not most) real-life clinical situations where incomplete objective evidence is available.2 For this purpose we used a composite case example, closely based on actual cases.

The example illustrates the physician weighing the evidence for and against a symptom–exposure association and possibilities for intervention, and deciding that the combined weight of evidence was sufficient to recommend a trial removal of the photocopier (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

We appreciate that there are differing views as to what constitutes reasonable accommodation. This is particularly so in some modern workplaces where people are share space and have diminished control over their environment. Employers have faced liability when reasonable accommodation was not made.8 If an employer was reluctant or unable to accommodate the employee's need, or if the employee's symptoms did not improve with the trial intervention, then the cost of further clinical and workplace investigations could be justified. In this example, the employer was immediately accommodating (also reinforcing to his employee that she was valued), and the experiment was successful, with beneficial results for the employee's health and productivity.

Lynn Marshall Environmental Health Clinic Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre Toronto, Ont. Erica Weir Community Medicine Resident Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University Hamilton, Ont. Alan Abelsohn Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Toronto Toronto, Ont. Margaret D. Sanborn Department of Family Medicine McMaster University Hamilton, Ont.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Marshall L, Weir E, Abelsohn A, Sanborn MD. Identifying and managing adverse environmental health effects: 1. Taking an exposure history. CMAJ 2002;166(8):1049-55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    The health and environment handbook for health professionals. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1998. p. 19-23. Available: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehp/ehd/catalogue/bch_pubs/98ehd211/98ehd211.htm (accessed 2002 July 3).
  3. 3.
    Stenberg B, Eriksson N, Hoog J, Sundell J, Wall S. The sick buiding syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23(6):1190-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    Tuomi T, Engstrom B, Niemela R, Svinhufvud J, Reijula K. Emission of ozone and organic volatiles from a selection of laser printers and photocopiers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000;15 (8): 629-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    Paz C. Some consequences of ozone exposure on health [review].Arch Med Res 1997;28(2):163-70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.
    Daly AK, Cholerton S, Armstrong M, Idle JR. Genotyping for polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolism as a predictor of disease susceptibility. Environ Health Perspect 1994;102(Suppl 9): 55-61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.
    Rosenstock L, Cullen MR, editors. Textbook of clinical occupational and environmental medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1994. p. 11.
  8. 8.↵
    Fink S. Health authority failed to protect radiographer from x-ray fumes [case note]. Saf Health Pract 1996;July:38-40.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 7
1 Oct 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Occupational and environmental exposure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Occupational and environmental exposure
Lynn Marshall, Erica Weir, Alan Abelsohn, Margaret D. Sanborn
CMAJ Oct 2002, 167 (7) 744-746;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Occupational and environmental exposure
Lynn Marshall, Erica Weir, Alan Abelsohn, Margaret D. Sanborn
CMAJ Oct 2002, 167 (7) 744-746;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Human Exposure Assessment and Relief From Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: Case Study of a Hairdresser
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire