Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Cut circumcision from list of routine services, Saskatchewan MDs advised

Amy Jo Ehman
CMAJ September 03, 2002 167 (5) 532-532-a;
Amy Jo Ehman
Saskatoon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • The danger of circumcision litigation is real
    George Hill
    Posted on: 06 September 2002
  • Posted on: (6 September 2002)
    Page navigation anchor for The danger of circumcision litigation is real
    The danger of circumcision litigation is real
    • George Hill, Executive secretary

    Dear Editor:

          The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan’s decision to ask doctors to refuse to perform non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision of male infants1 is well taken.

          The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) advised in 1975 that "there is no medical indication for circumcision during the neonatal...

    Show More

    Dear Editor:

          The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan’s decision to ask doctors to refuse to perform non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision of male infants1 is well taken.

          The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) advised in 1975 that "there is no medical indication for circumcision during the neonatal period."2 Then, in 1996 the CPS recommended that "circumcision of newborns should not be routinely (i.e., in the absence of a medical indication) performed,"3 so the CPS actually is saying that circumcision of the newborn should not be performed period.

          The injury inherent in every male circumcision was described in great detail by John R Taylor, a Winnipeg pathologist, in 1996.4 Taylor reported new anatomical and histological examinations of the foreskin tissue. He found that the foreskin is heavily vascularized, innervated specialized mucosa with a structure that suggests an important role in human sexual response. He documented the amount of tissue lost to circumcision. Thus, the inherent injury is now well documented in the medical literature. Everyone has a legal right to bodily integrity. Non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision excises healthy functional tissue, thus violating bodily integrity and creates a cause of action.

          The Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association now describes male neonatal circumcision as a non-therapeutic procedure.5 Parents may not have the legal power to grant proxy consent for non-therapeutic procedures.6 If parents lack power to grant proxy consent for non-therapeutic procedures, then the most meticulous attention to informed consent requirements7 may be of no avail should a lawsuit occur.

          Kendel’s remarks about ‘long-tail liability’ are well-taken.8 One who is injured while yet a minor has a right to institute litigation to recover damages upon reaching the age of majority. Thus, a child injured as an infant in 2002 may institute litigation in 2020 and perhaps later.

          The danger of litigation is more than theoretical. A young man in the state of New York has instituted litigation in Federal Court to recover damages from the obstetrician who circumcised the man as an infant and the hospital where the circumcision was performed.9 The suit has survived a motion for dismissal and is moving to trial.

          Concern also has been expressed in other countries. Legato, in the United States, has called for a searching reexamination of circumcision of the newborn.10 Bates has sounded the alarm in Australia,11 and Edge has done likewise in the United Kingdom.12

          In view of the gravity of the matter, one is surprised that other Canadian provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons have not acted to warn their doctors of the risks involved in the continued performance of non-therapeutic circumcision on minors.

    George Hill
    Executive Secretary
    Doctors Opposing Circumcision
    Suite 42, 2442 NW Market Street
    Seattle, Washington 98107
    USA
    Web: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/

    References

    1. Kendel, D. A. Caution Against Routine Circumcision of Newborn Male Infants (Memorandum to physicians and surgeons of Saskatchewan). Saskatoon: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, February 20, 2002. Photocopy
    2. Foetus and Newborn Committee. FN 75-01: Circumcision in the Newborn Period. CPS News Bull Suppl 1975; 8(2):1-2.
    3. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. Neonatal circumcision revisited . (CPS) Canad Med Assoc J 1996; 154(6): 769-780.
    4. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291-29.
    5. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Report 10: Neonatal circumcision. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1999.
    6. Somerville MA. Therapeutic and Non-Therapeutic Medical Procedures -- What are the Distinctions?Health Law in Canada 1981;2(4):85-9.
    7. Reibl v. Hughes, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880.
    8. Ehman AJ. Cut circumcision from list of routine services, Saskatchewan MDs advised. CMAJ 2002; 167 (5):
    9. Anonymous. Suing Over Circumcision: Man Says Lack Of Foreskin Hurts Sex Life. ABC News, 12 March 2001.
    10. Legato MJ. Rethinking Circumcision: Medical Intervention, Religious Ceremony, or Genital Mutilation?J Gend Specif Med 2002;5(4):8-10.
    11. Bates F. Males, medical mutilation and the law: some recent developments. 9 J Law Med 2001;9:68-75.
    12. Edge PW Male circumcision after the human rights act 1998. 5 J Civil Liberties 2000;5: 320-337.


    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 5
3 Sep 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cut circumcision from list of routine services, Saskatchewan MDs advised
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cut circumcision from list of routine services, Saskatchewan MDs advised
Amy Jo Ehman
CMAJ Sep 2002, 167 (5) 532-532-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Cut circumcision from list of routine services, Saskatchewan MDs advised
Amy Jo Ehman
CMAJ Sep 2002, 167 (5) 532-532-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Acute venous stasis and swelling of the lower abdomen and extremities in an infant after circumcision
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Pediatrics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire