Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Genetics 101: cytogenetics and FISH

Alison Sinclair
CMAJ August 20, 2002 167 (4) 373-374;
Alison Sinclair
Dr. Sinclair is a medical writer in Victoria, BC. She was formerly an Editorial Fellow with .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Karyotyping is the isolation, staining and visual examination of chromosomes to find chromosomal rearrangements. Karyotyping is used in prenatal diagnosis (particularly amniocentesis for trisomy 21), investigation of repeat pregnancy loss, investigation of children and adults with features suggestive of a syndrome (dysmorphic features or other associated anomalies, mental retardation, learning disabilities or behavioural anomalies), and subtyping of lymphomas, leukemias and solid tumours1,2 for the purpose of exact diagnosis, treatment stratification and prognosis.

Cells are cultured from samples of blood, bone marrow, amniotic fluid, tissue or tumour under sterile conditions for 4–7 days, depending upon the cell type. For karyotyping the chromosomes must be isolated from cells in the metaphase, which is the stage of the cell cycle in which the chromosomes assume their characteristic condensed, discrete shape. Various chemical agents may be added to the cultured cells to synchronize their cell cycles and make it possible to bring the maximum number to a predictable metaphase. The cells are then swollen by the addition of hypotonic solution to disperse the chromosomes, which are fixed chemically, examined microscopically and then stained. Standard G-banding (Giemsa, Leishman's or variant) produces a banding pattern that is characteristic of the individual chromosomes and allows identification of abnormalities in the number and morphology (deletion, addition, translocation of large segments of DNA) of chromosomes (Fig. 1).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 1: Standard G-banded karyotype: each chromosome has a characteristic banding pattern, allowing the identification of gross duplications, deletions, additions and translocations. Photo: Eric Wooltorton

Cytogenetic analysis by G-banding cannot resolve structural abnormalities that are small (best resolution is about 2000–3000 kilobases),3 within G-negative bands or involve translocations between regions that have similar staining patterns. Resolution is also dependent upon the cell of origin. Resolution from blood lymphocytes is better than that from fibroblasts grown from amniotic fluid, and both are generally better than cells from tumours.

Resolution of very small deletions (microdeletions) and small translocations is possible with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).4 This technique uses short sequences of single-stranded DNA (probes) that carry fluorescent tags to detect chromosomal DNA with a complementary sequence. Gene-specific probes, also known as “locus specific,” bind to single areas of a chromosome, whether a gene, or a repetitive sequence such as a centromere or telomere. Such locus- specific probes can detect abnormal duplication of a gene (Fig. 2) or chromosome. The use of 2 different gene-specific probes can detect translocations too small to detect by normal karyotyping, such as when genetic material from the c-abl oncogene on chromosome 9 is inserted into the BCR gene on chromosome 22 as occurs in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Whole chromosome probes are mixtures of smaller, chromosome-specific probes, which allow each chromosome to be “painted” a different colour.5,6 Chromosome painting does not detect translocations within chromosomes or allow precise identification of breakpoints. Various extensions of the technique are under development such as spectral banding, which creates a multicoloured banding pattern.7

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 2: Visualization of genes using locus-specific FISH probes: red signals (see arrows) hybridized to the chromosomes of a metaphase cell and an adjacent interphase nucleus demonstrate normal numbers of the cyclin D1 gene. Inset: excess copies of the RB1 gene (green) and cyclin D1 gene (red) are demonstrated in human breast cancer cells. Photo: Doug J. Demetrick

The potential of FISH to detect much smaller chromosomal abnormalities than can be detected with karyotyping has already been mentioned. FISH does not require cells to be in the metaphase before analysis, because it relies upon the presence or absence of a fluorescent signal to identify chromosomes or parts of chromosomes, rather than a specific banding pattern. It allows the surveillance of more cells and requires a much smaller sample than karyotyping — even down to a single cell. Increasingly, this technique has moved from the research laboratory into routine use, particularly when specimens are in limited quantity (such as those for prenatal diagnosis) or give poor-quality results (tumours) or negative results (microdeletion syndromes) on karyotyping.

𝛃 See related article page 367

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Pedersen-Pjergaard J. Molecular cytogenetics in cancer. Lancet 2001;357:492-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Olopade O, Sobulo O, Rowley JD. Recurring chromosomal arrangements in human cancer. In: Bast RC Jr, Gansler TS, Holland JF, Frei E, editors. Cancer medicine e.5. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2000.
  3. 3.↵
    McNeil N, Ried T. Novel molecular cytogenetic techniques for identifying complex chromosomal rearrangements: technology and applications in molecular medicine. Exp Rev Mol Med 2000;Sept 14. Available: www.ermm.cbcu.cam.ac.uk/00001940.htm (accessed 2002 July 19).
  4. 4.↵
    Demetrick DJ. Gone FISHin' for genes. CMAJ 1999;161(9):1138.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Uhrig S, Schuffenhauer S, Fauth C, Wirtz A, Daumer-Haas C, Apacik C, et al. Multiplex-FISH for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65(2):448-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Bayani J, Squire JA. Advances in the detection of chromosomal aberrations using spectral karyotyping. Clin Genet 2001;59:65-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Kakazu N, Ashihara E, Hada S, Ueda T, Sasaki H, Terada M, et al. Development of spectral colour banding in cytogenetic analysis. Lancet 2001; 357(9255):529-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 4
20 Aug 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetics 101: cytogenetics and FISH
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Genetics 101: cytogenetics and FISH
Alison Sinclair
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (4) 373-374;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Genetics 101: cytogenetics and FISH
Alison Sinclair
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (4) 373-374;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Medical genetics: 2. The diagnostic approach to the child with dysmorphic signs
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Stem Cell Therapy in Perspective
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A blistering variant of phlegmasia cerulea dolens from underlying squamous cell lung cancer
  • Parechovirus infections in infants
  • Radiation dermatitis in a patient treated for hepatocarcinoma
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire