Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Molecular epidemiology and the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission among foreign-born people

Megan B. Murray
CMAJ August 20, 2002 167 (4) 355-356;
Megan B. Murray
Dr. Murray is Assistant Professor of Epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As incidence rates of tuberculosis fall in wealthy countries and rise in at least some poorer countries, it is not surprising that much of tuberculosis in Canada and the United States occurs in foreign-born people. The high risk of tuberculosis in immigrants to Europe, Australia, the United States and Canada has been well documented.1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Although several studies have shown that the risk of tuberculosis is greatest in the first 3–5 years after arrival in the host country,3,8 others have shown that it persists for an extended period and increases with age.9 These findings are consistent with the widely accepted hypothesis that foreign-born people are infected in their country of origin and then either primary disease develops shortly after immigration or the people remain at risk for reactivated disease for the rest of their lives.

Until recently it was not possible to distinguish definitively between primary tuberculosis and reactivated disease, nor was it possible for epidemiologists to determine the proportion of cases due to recent infection and the proportion due to reactivation of remotely acquired infection. The use of DNA fingerprinting to distinguish between epidemiologically related and unrelated strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis offers a new method of solving this problem and has led to the emergence of the field of molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis.

Since the advent of these molecular techniques 10 years ago, numerous community-based studies have been conducted to estimate the incidence of recently transmitted disease and to identify risk factors for recent transmission. These studies typically enroll patients with active tuberculosis, “fingerprint” their isolates and then classify them as having shared (clustered) isolates or having unique (nonclustered) isolates. People with clustered isolates are assumed to belong to a transmission chain, and those with unique isolates are assumed to have reactivated disease. Risk factors for clustering are estimated by comparing the frequency of a characteristic among the clustered cases with that among unique cases.

To some extent these studies have helped clarify the epidemiology of tuberculosis among foreign-born people in countries with low prevalence rates of the disease. Multiple molecular epidemiologic studies in these settings have shown that foreign-born people are more likely to have unique isolates than clustered ones and that there is little evidence that tuberculosis has spread from foreign-born people to those born in the host country.10,11,12 These findings have helped to quell the fear that immigrants are a source of rampant infectious disease transmission and have focused attention on the unexpected transmission among non-immigrants in developed countries.13

Despite these reassuring findings, some caution in the interpretation of the results may be warranted. When molecular epidemiologic studies give estimates of the risk of clustering among foreign-born people, they are not assessing the incidence of recently transmitted disease in the population at risk for the disease. Rather, they are comparing the number of cases of recently transmitted disease with the number of cases of reactivated disease. Since foreign-born people are far more likely to have been infected in the past, they are also more likely to have reactivated tuberculosis than are people born in countries with low prevalence rates. This does not necessarily mean that foreign-born people are at low risk of recently transmitted disease, only that they are at greater risk of reactivated disease.

Consider, for example, 2 recently published studies of tuberculosis transmission among foreign-born people in New York City14 and Denmark.15 In the New York study Geng and coauthors fingerprinted 546 isolates of M. tuberculosis, of which about half belonged to a cluster (thus likely transmitted) and the remainder were unique (interpreted as reactivated disease).14 Analysis showed that people born outside the United States were much less likely to be in the clustered group (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.33–0.67). Nonetheless, this study showed that, among the tuberculosis patients who had been in the United States for less than 10 years and who were not HIV positive, almost half had clustered isolates, which suggested recent transmission. Similarly, in the Denmark study of tuberculosis transmission among Somali immigrants, 55% of the tuberculosis cases were clustered.15 Although it is indeed possible that some of these clustered cases were acquired in Somalia, as the authors suggested, it is perhaps equally plausible that tuberculosis is being transmitted within immigrant communities in the host country. This may be especially likely among very recent immigrants, possibly because the socioeconomic conditions in which they find themselves lead to transmission of airborne infectious diseases.

The 2 studies of tuberculosis transmission reported in this issue (pages 349 and 353) highlight some of these issues. In the first article, Eduardo Hernández-Garduño and coauthors16 used molecular fingerprinting to classify all M. tuberculosis isolates available in Greater Vancouver over a 3-year period. Although they found that birth outside Canada was strongly associated with the probability of having a unique isolate, they also found that half of the clustered cases involved foreign-born people. Because it is unlikely that half the population of Greater Vancouver was born outside Canada, it follows that, in Vancouver, the risk of recently transmitted tuberculosis must be higher among immigrants than among people born in Canada. Similarly, although the odds ratio for belonging to a cluster was high among Aboriginal patients, there were half as many patients with recently transmitted disease who were Aboriginal as there were who were foreign born. In the second article, Sophie Kulaga and coauthors17 report on a similar study over a 2-year period in Montreal. Unlike the Vancouver investigators, this group found that Haitian birth was the only risk factor for being in a cluster.

Despite their differences, both of these studies show that 80% of the tuberculosis cases reported in these cities occurred in foreign-born people. Clearly, this group remains at risk for tuberculosis and should be the target of future control strategies.

𝛃 See related articles pages 349 and 353

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis morbidity among US-born and foreign-born populations — United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51(5):101-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Weis SE, Moonan PK, Pogoda JM, Turk L, King B, Freeman-Thompson S, Burgess G. Tuberculosis in the foreign-born population of Tarrant County, Texas, by immigration status. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:953-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Talbot EA, Moore M, McCray E, Binkin NJ. Tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the United States, 1993–1998. JAMA 2000;284(22):2894-900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Wobeser WL, Yuan L, Naus M, Corey P, Edelson J, Heywood N, et al. Expanding the epidemiologic profile: risk factors for active tuberculosis in people immigrating to Ontario. CMAJ 2000;163(7):823-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Felten MK, Rath T, Magdorf K, Klett M, Leichsenring M. Childhood tuberculosis in Germany between 1985 and 1994: comparison of three selected patient groups. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:797-803.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Eriksson M, Bennet R, Danielsson N. Clinical manifestations and epidemiology of childhood tuberculosis in Stockholm 1976–95. Scand J Infect Dis 1997; 29:569-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Lambregts-van Weezenbeek CS, Jansen HM, Nagelkerke NJ, van Klingeren B, Veen J. Nationwide surveillance of drug-resistant tuberculosis in The Netherlands: rates, risk factors and treatment outcome. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:288-95.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    McKenna MT, McCray E, Onorato I. The epidemiology of tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the United States, 1986 to 1993. N Engl J Med 1995 20;332:1071-6.
  9. 9.↵
    Zuber PL, McKenna MT, Binkin NJ, Onorato IM, Castro KG. Long-term risk of tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the United States. JAMA 1997;278:304-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Hopewell PC. Using conventional and molecular epidemiological analyses to target tuberculosis control interventions in a low incidence area. Novartis Found Symp 1998;217:42-54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Alland D, Kalkut GE, Moss AR, McAdam RA, Hahn JA, Bosworth W, et al. Transmission of tuberculosis in New York City. An analysis by DNA fingerprinting and conventional epidemiologic methods. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1710-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Borgdorff MW, Behr MA, Nagelkerke NJ, Hopewell PC, Small PM. Transmission of tuberculosis in San Francisco and its association with immigration and ethnicity. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:287-94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Bloom BR. Tuberculosis — the global view. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1434-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Geng E, Kreiswirth B, Driver C, Li J, Burzynski J, DellaLatta P, et al. Changes in the transmission of tuberculosis in New York City from 1990 to 1999. N Engl J Med 2002;346(19):1453-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Lillebaek T, Andersen AB, Dirksen A, Smith E, Skovgaard LT, Kok-Jensen A. Persistent high incidence of tuberculosis in immigrants in a low-incidence country. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:679-84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Hernández-Garduño E, Kunimoto D, Wang L, Rodrigues M, Elwood RK, Black W, et al. Predictors of clustering of tuberculosis in Greater Vancouver: a molecular epidemiologic study. CMAJ 2002;167(4):349-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Kulaga S, Behr M, Musana K, Brinkman J, Menzies D, Brassard P, et al. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Montreal. CMAJ 2002;167(4):353-4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 4
20 Aug 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular epidemiology and the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission among foreign-born people
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Molecular epidemiology and the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission among foreign-born people
Megan B. Murray
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (4) 355-356;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Molecular epidemiology and the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission among foreign-born people
Megan B. Murray
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (4) 355-356;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Predictors of clustering of tuberculosis in Greater Vancouver: a molecular epidemiologic study
  • Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Montreal
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Active screening at entry for tuberculosis among new immigrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Long-Term Population-Based Genotyping Study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates in the French Departments of the Americas
  • Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis among Immigrants in Hamburg, Germany
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time for a regulatory framework for pediatric medications in Canada
  • Optimizing timing of completion of the Surgical Safety Checklist to account for emergence from anesthesia
  • Shifting from cytology to HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Infectious diseases
    • Molecular medicine
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire