Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Effects of marijuana on young adults

Peter A. Fried, Barb Watkinson and Robert Gray
CMAJ August 06, 2002 167 (3) 234;
Peter A. Fried
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barb Watkinson
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Gray
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Maggie Mamen claims that using IQ ignores the possibility that marijuana may have an impact on multiple domains of cognitive functioning. Far from being ignored, this was raised in both the interpretation of the results and in the abstract of our article.1 We emphasized that the drug's impact on particular domains of intelligence (memory and attention were highlighted) must be ascertained and may differ from a broadly based measure of intelligence represented by IQ. This is ongoing in our research at the moment.

IQ was chosen for our report of preliminary findings for many reasons. Primarily, this work was intended to contrast our findings with previous research in which no premorbid cognitive values were available. The vast majority of these studies employed IQ as a concurrent outcome variable and thus our use of IQ was a matter of permitting an “oranges to oranges” comparison with the other studies. Furthermore, although intelligence is unquestionably multifaceted, the IQ measure remains a major, widely used barometer of intellectual performance. For example, in most school boards (including the 2 boards in the Ottawa , Ont. area) it is the cornerstone of initial assessment of children and, in examining the outcome of exposure to drugs (prenatal or concurrent), IQ values are ubiquitously cited.

Regarding the use of marijuana during pregnancy, our research group has published over 100 papers on prenatal marijuana exposure and its impact on a host of outcomes. This putative relationship will, in fact, be the subject of future reports. However, (in part due to space limitations imposed by CMAJ) for the purposes of the published article, prenatal exposure was found not to be associated with IQ change.

Paul Yong suggests a possible similarity in marijuana use between former users and non-users. What follows is a more detailed description of these 2 groups. Of the 37 non-users, 18 had never used marijuana and 19 had used marijuana but never at the level of at least once a week. Of the 19 non-users who had tried marijuana in the past, only 7 had used it in the past year. In contrast, all 9 of the former users had smoked at least once a week previously with an average use of 21.4 joints per week for an average of 2.2 years.

Regarding the power issue with the sample size of heavy former users, 5 former heavy users showed an average IQ difference score of 0.8, which did not differ significantly from the non-users. Definitely, this comparison suffers from lack of statistical power and was meant only as an initial foray to compare heavy former use with heavy current use.

Ian Shrier asks if there was an increase in the proportion of people below 77.5 in our sample. The lowest IQ measured in our relatively small sample was 84. The projection of our results onto standard cutpoints was an example of the potential impact on society at large.

Shrier's suggestion that heavy users with higher IQ scores initially might be affected differentially from those initially scoring lower is interesting. Although not originally addressed in our article, that analysis has now been done. The correlation between initial IQ and the IQ difference score is not significant (r = –0.34, p = 0.21). In addition, when the initial IQ is dichotomized at the median, no difference exists between the IQ difference scores (F = 0.21, p = 0.65). When former users were examined in the same fashion, the results were the same, and no effect on difference scores was related to initial IQ.

Peter A. Fried Barb Watkinson Robert Gray Department of Psychology Carleton University Ottawa, Ont.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    Fried P, Watkinson B, James D, Gray R. Current and former marijuana use: preliminary findings of a longitudinal study of effects on IQ in young adults. CMAJ 2002;166(7):887-91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 3
6 Aug 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of marijuana on young adults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effects of marijuana on young adults
Peter A. Fried, Barb Watkinson, Robert Gray
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (3) 234;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Effects of marijuana on young adults
Peter A. Fried, Barb Watkinson, Robert Gray
CMAJ Aug 2002, 167 (3) 234;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
  • Observational evidence in support of screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Addiction medicine
    • Psychiatry & mental health: adult

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire