Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research of the Holiday Kind

Do reindeer and children know something that we don't? Pediatric inpatients' belief in Santa Claus

Claude Cyr
CMAJ December 10, 2002 167 (12) 1325-1327;
Claude Cyr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I am 8 years old. Some of my little friends say there is no Santa Claus. Papa says, ‘If you see it in The Sun, it’s so.' Please tell me the truth, is there a Santa Claus? — Virginia O'Hanlon

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Romi Caron

Virginia, your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by the scepticism of a sceptical age. They do not believe except [what] they see. They think that nothing can be which is not comprehensible by their little minds. All minds, Virginia, whether they be men's or children's, are little. In this great universe of ours, man is a mere insect, an ant, in his intellect as compared with the boundless world about him, as measured by the intelligence capable of grasping the whole of truth and knowledge. Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. — Editorial by Francis Church, New York Sun, 1897

Although Santa Claus is one of the most popular mythical figures of childhood in Western culture, there is surprisingly little medical literature on the topic.1,2,3,4 Prentice and colleagues, in their study of children in the general population, showed a decline in belief with increasing age.3 They also showed that children's level of causal reasoning increased with age and was related to the decline in belief in Santa.3,4 To my knowledge, there are no published data on belief in Santa Claus among children who are hospital inpatients, so I decided to investigate this question. Based on both the literature and on common sense, I anticipated that belief in Santa would decrease with age. Furthermore, I assumed that a general predisposition to fantasy would parallel belief in Santa.

Methods

The 45 children studied consisted of 22 girls and 23 boys, conveniently selected for their ability to communicate and the presence and approval of their parents. All the families involved were Christian (Catholic or Protestant). The study was carried out in a general pediatric ward and a pediatric intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital in late April 2002.

A modified structured Santa Claus Interview was used.3 It consisted of an initial open-ended request to “tell me about Santa.” Answers to this question provided a good indication of the content and intensity of the child's belief. Questions about knowledge of the myth (Santa's costume, the colour of Santa's beard and the geographical location of his house) were asked if the child did not spontaneously provide that information. Answers considered correct were, respectively, a red suit, a white beard and at or near the North Pole, although it emerged later in my research that the real location of Santa's house was elsewhere (see Interpretation). Each child's belief in Santa was scored by the principal investigator using a 5-point scale of belief in Santa: 0 = definite disbelief, 1 = probable disbelief, 2 = ambivalent opinion, 3 = probable belief, 4 = definite belief. Children with scores ≥ 3 were considered believers in Santa.

Parents' belief in Santa was investigated as an indirect marker of fantasy predisposition. This question was asked in the absence of the child to prevent any “forced belief” by parents. If parents did not believe in Santa, they were asked to evaluate the age at which they stopped believing in Santa. In order to investigate other imaginary figures of childhood, a 5-point scale of belief in the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny was developed and used to question the children. I also asked about the existence of imaginary friends. The age at which parents stopped believing in Santa was summed with the children's scores on the tooth fairy and Easter bunny questions to give a final score (HOHO score) of family fantasy predisposition.

Data were analyzed initially using univariate techniques. Univariate association with belief in Santa was evaluated with Fisher's exact test for nominal variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. I attempted to develop a multivariate model. Factors with statistically nonsignificant (using a conservative significance level of p > 0.25) univariate association with belief in Santa were excluded from further consideration. The remaining factors were entered into a multiple logistic regression model, with belief in Santa as the outcome variable.

Results

There were no significant differences in belief in Santa between boys and girls. Factors considered in the univariate analysis are presented in Table 1. Belief in Santa diminished with increasing age (Fig. 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 1: Belief in Santa Claus by age group.

Candidate predictor variables by univariate association with a p value that was less than 0.25 were included in a logistic regression model. Two predictors remained in the final model: age less than 8 years (odds ratio [OR] 46.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8–557.0; p = 0.003) and parents' age at which they stopped believing in Santa above the age of 10 years (OR = 59.5, 95% CI 3.5–1003.0). Because I placed high value on sensitivity, I sought to define predictive factors with the highest possible sensitivity. The presence of any one of these variables predicted belief in Santa with a sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.85–0.99) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66–0.89).

Interpretation

Among this sample of chldren who were hospital inpatients, awareness of Santa Claus was universal. All the children in this study were quite familiar with Santa Claus, even if they did not view Santa as real. This study also demonstrated that belief in Santa is inversely proportional to a child's age and directly proportional to the age at which their parents stopped believing in Santa. This last information might be relevant to more fantasy-oriented families in which parental encouragement for the child to believe was very strong.2

A study of children who were not hospital inpatients showed that they generally discover the truth on their own at the age of 7 years. Children reported predominantly positive reactions on learning the truth: 2 of 3 said that they felt a sense of pride in figuring out the truth about Santa. Half of them thought that even though Santa was not real, they liked the idea of Santa. Parents, however, described themselves as predominantly sad in reaction to their child's discovery.2 However, it is not until the middle childhood period (from 7 to 12 years) that children are able to think about Santa Claus simultaneously in 2 different ways: as a pleasing idea that helps them enjoy Christmas and as someone who is not real.

Fourteen of 27 believers in Santa in this study did not know the location of Santa's house. This can be explained by the fact that contrary to popular belief, and to what I had believed, Santa Claus most likely does not live at the North Pole. He lives in Lapland, in northern Finland, where the reindeer roam. In 1927, a Finnish radio program pinpointed Santa's location on Lapland's Korvatunturi, or “Ear Mountain.” The area resembles a rabbit's ears, from which Santa can hear if the boys and girls of the world are being naughty or nice.

The fact that the HOHO score failed to be related to belief in Santa in the multivariate analysis is puzzling. The HOHO score, a measure of fantasy predisposition, may reflect more an assimilation of cultural folklore than independent fantasy predisposition. Initial belief in Santa might be an example of a myth inspired by parents seeking to fulfill their own infantile needs,5 but the chronic believers might be more fantasy-oriented children. Thus, the HOHO score might be more predictive in the older group. Further studies are needed to clarify the use of the HOHO score in an older population of children.

The limitations of this study are numerous. The timing of the questionnaire (late April 2002) might overestimate the rate of belief in the Easter bunny and underestimate the rate of belief in Santa. Furthermore, I did not study what functions children's belief in Santa fulfill for their parents, nor the contribution of the parents to the internalization and subsequent relinquishing of the myth.

So what is the truth about Santa Claus? I agree with the famous reply of Francis Church who wrote in the New York Sun in reply to a letter from an 8-year-old girl, “Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist.” Children who are hospital inpatients and either aged less than 8 years or whose parents believed in Santa for more than 10 years are more likely to believe in Santa Claus and, I hope, in love, generosity and devotion.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: The author (still) believes in Santa Claus.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Nelms BC. Santa Claus: Good or bad for children? J Pediatr Health Care 1996;10(6):243-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Anderson CJ, Prentice NM. Encounter with reality: children's reactions on discovering the Santa Claus myth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 1994;25(2):67-84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Prentice NM, Schmechel LK, Manosevitz M. Children's belief in santa claus: a developmental study of fantasy and causality. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1979;18(4):658-67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Prentice NM, Manosevitz M, Hubbs L. Imaginary figures of early childhood: santa claus, easter bunny, and the tooth fairy. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1978;48 (4):618-28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Sereno R. Some observations on the Santa Claus custom. Psychiatry 1951; 14: 387-96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 12
10 Dec 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do reindeer and children know something that we don't? Pediatric inpatients' belief in Santa Claus
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Do reindeer and children know something that we don't? Pediatric inpatients' belief in Santa Claus
Claude Cyr
CMAJ Dec 2002, 167 (12) 1325-1327;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Do reindeer and children know something that we don't? Pediatric inpatients' belief in Santa Claus
Claude Cyr
CMAJ Dec 2002, 167 (12) 1325-1327;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Whats in your stocking?: Evidence around Santa Claus
  • Santa Claus: a public health pariah?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Audiovisual hyperactivity disorder (AVHD): a peril of the desire to Excel
  • Stableford: Equitable golf-scoring system or quality-of-life measure?
Show more Research of the Holiday Kind

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire