Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

BC court wades into medical-necessity debate over autism treatment

Heather Kent
CMAJ November 26, 2002 167 (11) 1278;
Heather Kent
Vancouver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling that the province violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by refusing to fund an early-intervention treatment program for autistic children. The treatment costs about about $60 000 per child per year (CMAJ 2000;163[9]:1181).

Parents of autistic children filed their suit in 1998, and 2 years later a BC Supreme Court judge declared the treatment — Lovaas therapy — medically necessary. The province appealed, but last month's unanimous appeal court ruling concluded that autism “is a medical disability just as cancer is, and both require treatment.” The court rejected the government's claim that it was unable to pay for the treatment and also changed the maximum age for eligibility from 6 years to 19 years. It is estimated that there are 1400 autistic children under age 19 living in BC.

Michael Lewis of the BC Autism Society praised the court for a “very, very strong judgement.” Sabrina Freeman of Families for Early Autism Treatment of British Columbia says that group is “extremely happy” with the judges' assertion that intensive behavioural therapy is “the only effective treatment for autism.” Freeman says the judgement has important national implications because Alberta, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Ontario are currently involved in litigation regarding autism treatment. Only Prince Edward Island funds Lovaas treatment to age 19.

Freeman remains skeptical about whether the government will comply with the decision. “I firmly believe that it will be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada,” she says. The province has not confirmed this.

Although the province appealed the 2000 ruling, it did begin providing parents of 500 autistic children under age 6 with $20 000 each in annual funding, says Freeman. Under that program, parents become eligible for funding if they have 2 letters from a family doctor, pediatrician or psychologist. They then have to hire a Lovaas therapy consultant, who creates a treatment program and trains a team of about 5 therapists to work with the child for 4 to 9 hours weekly. The therapy involves intensive work in language, socialization and behaviour.

Dr. Melvin De Levie, a Vancouver pediatrician who diagnoses about 30 cases of autism a year, says parents “still have to scramble” in a patchwork system once a diagnosis is made. Although he is pleased with the “very decisive” court decision, he says BC faces a problem because it has no education program for Lovaas therapists: “We need to develop our own resources.” — Heather Kent, Vancouver

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 167, Issue 11
26 Nov 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
BC court wades into medical-necessity debate over autism treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
BC court wades into medical-necessity debate over autism treatment
Heather Kent
CMAJ Nov 2002, 167 (11) 1278;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
BC court wades into medical-necessity debate over autism treatment
Heather Kent
CMAJ Nov 2002, 167 (11) 1278;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Medicine & the law (including forensic medicine)

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire