Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Letters

Revisiting the modern scientific physician

Sylvia R. Cruess and Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ April 16, 2002 166 (8) 1013-1013-a;
Sylvia R. Cruess
Centre for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Cruess
Centre for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The 8 articles by Olli Miettinen are thought-provoking and timely.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Medicine as a profession has the obligation to review its basic premises in relation to the needs of society on a regular basis, and Miettinen recommends such a step. The series has removed some of the myths surrounding the concept of the physician and identifies the attributes of the scientific practitioner. This has obvious relevance to how physicians should be taught and trained. As practice is becoming increasing specialized, Miettinen identifies the need to re-examine what he calls “the medical common.” He has correctly identified the quite necessary relationship between the curriculum, medical licensing and postgraduate training, a subject on which he has previously published.9

There are several issues of concern. One wonders what the public response would be, as at the present time the public expects physicians to have a fairly broad pool of knowledge, no matter how specialized they may be. Experience in different subjects and practices is necessary to the extent that the student will learn to “know about” this broader field of knowledge. As a profession, medicine should consider these concepts in conjunction with the communities it serves so that physicians' skills and knowledge will meet society's needs and expectations. It would be of interest to know how Miettinen would accomplish this.

It would be instructive to know how Miettinen's “medical common” relates to the concept of the core curriculum that has been utilized in curricular design for some time. Is it different in concept, or only in content? It would also be instructive to know what process might be utilized to actually identify “the common.”

Medical education must be constantly re-evaluated, and Miettinen has challenged us to essentially start from the beginning, cutting ourselves loose from Flexnerian traditions. As we do this, the challenge will be to preserve the traditional values that have served society well while adapting to the reality of modern medicine.

Sylvia R. Cruess Richard L. Cruess Centre for Medical Education Faculty of Medicine McGill University Montreal, Que.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 1. Can practice be science? [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(4): 441-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 2. Medical science versus scientific medicine [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(5):591-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 3. Scientific diagnosis [editorial]. CMAJ 2001; 165 (6):781-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 4. The useful property of a diagnostic [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(7):910-1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 5. The useful property of an intervention [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(8):1059-60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 6. The useful property of a screening regimen [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(9):1219-20.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 7. Theory of medicine [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(10): 1327-8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Miettinen OS. The modern scientific physician: 8. Educational preparation [editorial]. CMAJ 2001;165(11):1501-3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Miettinen O, Flegel K. Medical curriculum and licensing: still in need of radical revision. Lancet 1997;340:956-7.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 8
16 Apr 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revisiting the modern scientific physician
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Revisiting the modern scientific physician
Sylvia R. Cruess, Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ Apr 2002, 166 (8) 1013-1013-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Revisiting the modern scientific physician
Sylvia R. Cruess, Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ Apr 2002, 166 (8) 1013-1013-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The 5 Ps need an update: toward a comprehensive sexual history
  • Don’t ignore perimenopause
  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical education, residency, internship

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire