Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Ottawa's GM food plan faces criticism

Janis Hass
CMAJ March 05, 2002 166 (5) 643;
Janis Hass
Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Some observers aren't impressed by a new federal action plan on the future of food biotechnology, which is Ottawa's response to the Royal Society of Canada's Expert Scientific Panel Report on the Safety of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods. Greenpeace representative Eric Darier describes it as “a whitewash” that “fails to absorb the critical analysis of the Royal Society,” but the panel cochairs were a bit more diplomatic.

“It was lukewarm at best,” says Brian Ellis, a plant biochemist at the University of British Columbia.

“There were no big surprises in the action plan,” adds Conrad Brunk, an academic dean at the University of Waterloo who specializes in environmental and bioethical issues. “My general feeling is that it is a step in the right direction. The question is, will it keep moving along? It is very noncommittal.”

But a Health Canada spokesperson defended Ottawa's response. “I guess it's an issue of interpretation,” says Paul Mayers, director of food policy integration.The federal government had asked the Royal Society to assemble an expert panel to provide scientific advice on the regulatory process and development of GM foods. In its report, the panel made 53 detailed recommendations that ranged from increasing the transparency of the regulatory process to monitoring the long-term effects of GM organisms on human health and the environment.

“We made many specific recommendations, and the action plan doesn't commit to [many] of them,” says Brunk. “The action plan tends to give them a lot of wiggle room.”

However, Mayers says the plan provides an agreement to work with external experts and members of the expert panel and to share information with other countries. “We're not closing the door to any particular mechanism.”

Ellis remains concerned about accountability. “They say they will be reporting back on their progress, but who are they reporting to? And in what fashion?”

Mayers counters that the federal government will report on progress to all Canadians “through the same mechanism as the action plan.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 5
5 Mar 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ottawa's GM food plan faces criticism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ottawa's GM food plan faces criticism
Janis Hass
CMAJ Mar 2002, 166 (5) 643;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ottawa's GM food plan faces criticism
Janis Hass
CMAJ Mar 2002, 166 (5) 643;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Monkeypox: tracking the global health emergency
  • Making sense of monkeypox death rates
  • Providing abortions to Americans could land Canadian doctors in legal trouble — without CMPA assistance
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Nutrition

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire