Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?

André N. Vis
CMAJ March 05, 2002 166 (5) 600-601;
André N. Vis
Dr. Vis is with the Department of Pathology and Urology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue (page 586),1 Linda Perron and colleagues question whether the recent decline in age-standardized prostate cancer mortality rates in Quebec could be attributed to screening with the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. By comparing the change in the incidence rate of prostate cancer between 1989 and 1993 with the change in the prostate cancer mortality rate between 1995 and 1999 in 15 birth cohorts, and in 15 regions of Quebec, the authors have elegantly shown that increased screening efforts with the PSA test were not correlated with the subsequent declining mortality rate.

PSA-based screening for prostate cancer remains a controversial issue. The availability of presumably valid screening tests and the potential success of curative treatment options such as radical prostatectomy have prompted some health authorities in the United States to advocate prostate cancer screening in men who ask about the PSA test.2,3 On the other hand, the Canadian Urological Association and most health authorities in the European Union still discourage the practice of prostate cancer screening.4,5

In the United States, following several decades of gradually increasing death rates that reached their peak in 1993, the prostate cancer mortality rate began to decline steadily in the late 1990s. Since 1993, the prostate cancer mortality rate has decreased by 17.6%, at an annual mean rate of 4.4% between 1994 and 1997.3,6 In Canada, the age-standardized prostate cancer mortality rate declined by 9.6% between 1991 and 1996.7 Some have already suggested that this trend provides evidence for the effectiveness of screening with the PSA test,8 however, the significance of the data concerning the decline in prostate cancer mortality is subject to differing interpretations.9,10,11

Many physicians consider that the application of the PSA test may not be the main reason for the decline in prostate cancer mortality. The reported decline may be the result of increased use of curative treatment options in cancers diagnosed by digital rectal examination (DRE) before the advent of PSA screening and the availability of improved treatment options for advanced prostate cancer, such as the early application of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. Changes in diet and lifestyle12,13 and improvements in environmental conditions14 may also have been responsible for improved outcomes in recent cohorts. The observation that mortality rates for prostate cancer have also declined in England and Wales, countries in which prostate cancer screening was only infrequently applied in that same period, seem to support these assumptions.15 Last, misclassification of deaths, that is “attribution bias” or the incorrect labelling of deaths from other causes as being death from prostate cancer, may account for some of the reported changes as well.16

Indirect evidence for a possible beneficial effect of prostate cancer screening came from the urology department of the University of Innsbruck, Austria, where, in contrast to other parts of Austria, the PSA test had been made freely available to the population in 1993 and acceptance of testing was high.17 The investigators reported 33% fewer prostate cancer deaths than expected in the Innsbruck area between 1996 and 1999 in men aged 40–79 years. The authors concluded that the policy of making the PSA assay universally available to the population (and at no cost) might have reduced the prostate cancer mortality rate in that population.17

In the Innsbruck study, however, ascribing observed changes in mortality to widespread PSA testing done only 3–6 years earlier is dubious. By comparison, in breast cancer screening an interval of at least 9 years was expected before any impact of an effective breast cancer screening program with mammography could be seen in the population.18 As shown by Perron and colleagues,1 the observed changes in the prostate cancer mortality rates so soon after the onset of widespread PSA testing are unlikely to be the result of increased screening efforts given the long natural course of most prostate cancers. If a beneficial effect of screening for prostate cancer with the PSA blood test is present at a population level, it will only begin to appear when the mean lead time of prostate cancer (the time by which diagnosis is advanced by screening) and the mean time from the clinical diagnosis to prostate cancer death have passed, that is, at least a decade after the initiation of screening efforts.11,19

The definitive answer to the question of whether PSA-based screening for prostate cancer leads to a decline in disease-specific mortality lies in the careful performance and completion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In such trials, following randomization, the screened group and the control group would be similar with respect to baseline characteristics, biases and confounders would be prevented, and changes in cause-specific mortality could be attributed to the application of the screening tests and early treatment. To date, only one RCT has reported an important primary end point of prostate cancer screening, namely, the prostate cancer death rate.20 This trial in Quebec showed that PSA-based screening for prostate cancer resulted in a reduction in prostate cancer mortality of up to 70% in those subjected to screening compared with those who were not.20

This study has been criticized, because the reseachers randomly allocated men to study groups before they agreed to take part in the RCT. In fact, only 23% of the trial population were willing to participate. The resulting decrease in statistical power could not be resolved, as the authors attempted, by transferring men from the control group who spontaneously sought a PSA test to the treatment arm of the trial or by the reverse manoeuvre for men in the treatment group who refused screening. Both ploys further compromised and invalidated the randomization.21 The study has also been faulted for the long lag time between randomization and screening — on average, 3 years. Given that only men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer could participate in the trial, those who were not screened at the time of analysis were at risk of prostate cancer mortality for a substantially longer period than those men in the screened group.22

Large-scale RCTs with the prostate cancer death rate as the primary end point were also begun in Europe and the United States in the early 1990s, namely, the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian cancer (PLCO) screening trial respectively. Therefore, a final answer to the question of whether screening for prostate cancer is truly beneficial at a population level can only be answered when these trials have been completed and properly analyzed, that is, not until the middle of the present decade.

𝛃 See related article page 586

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Perron L, Moore L, Bairati I, Bernard PM, Meyer F. PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. CMAJ 2002;166(5):586-91. Available: www .cma.ca/cmaj/vol-166/issue-5/0586.asp
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Carroll P, Coley C, McLeod D, Schellhammer P, Sweat G, Wasson J, et al. Prostate-specific antigen best practice policy – part I: early detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology 2001;57(2):217-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. Update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51: 38-44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care. Ottawa: Canada Communication Group; 1994.
  5. 5.↵
    Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention. Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1473-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Thun M. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51:15-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Meyer F, Moore L, Bairati I, Fadet Y. Downward trend in prostate cancer mortality in Quebec and Canada. J Urol 1999;161:1189-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP. Why is the prostate cancer death rate declining in the United States? Cancer 1998;82:249-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Stephenson RA, Smart CR, Mineau GP, James BC, Janerich DT, Dibble RL. The fall in incidence of prostate carcinoma. On the down side of a prostate specific antigen induced peak in incidence–data from the Utah Cancer Registry. Cancer 1996;77(7):1342-8.
  10. 10.↵
    Merrill RM, Stephenson RA. Trends in mortality rates in patients with prostate cancer during the era of prostate-specific antigen screening. J Urol 2000; 163:503-10.
  11. 11.↵
    Etzioni R, Legler JM, Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Cronin KA, Hankey BF. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer — part III: quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1033-9.
  12. 12.↵
    Blumenfeld AJ, Fleshner N, Casselman B, Trachtenberg J. Nutritional aspects of prostate cancer: a review. Can J Urol 2000;7:927-35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Schulman CC, Ekane S, Zlotta AR. Nutrition and prostate cancer; evidence or suspicion? Urology 2001;58:318-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Ekman P. Genetic and environmental factors in prostate cancer genesis: identifying high risk cohorts. Eur Urol 1999;35;362-9.
  15. 15.↵
    Oliver SE, Gunnell D, Donovan JL. Comparison of trends in prostate-cancer mortality in England and Wales and the USA. Lancet 2000;355:1788-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Hankey BF. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer — part II: cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91(12):1025-32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, Reissigl A, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, et al. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 2001; 58(3):417-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    de Koning HJ. Assessment of nation-wide cancer screening programmes. Lancet 2000;355:80-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostate cancer. JAMA 1995; 273:289-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Suburu RE, et al. Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 1999;38(2):83-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Boer R, Schröder FH. Quebec randomized controlled trial on prostate cancer screening shows no evidence for mortality reduction [letter]. Prostate 1999; 40:130-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Alexander FE. Screening decreases prostate cancer death. First analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial [letter]. Prostate 1999;40(2):135-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 5
5 Mar 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?
André N. Vis
CMAJ Mar 2002, 166 (5) 600-601;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Does PSA screening reduce prostate cancer mortality?
André N. Vis
CMAJ Mar 2002, 166 (5) 600-601;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Interpreting the Quebec prostate cancer study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Antiracism as a foundational competency: reimagining CanMEDS through an antiracist lens
  • Keeping the front door open: ensuring access to primary care for all in Canada
  • Improving post-tuberculosis care in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cancer: prostate
    • Screening & diagnostic tests

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire