Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Huge class-action settlement worries neurologists

Brad Mackay
CMAJ February 05, 2002 166 (3) 361-363;
Brad Mackay
Toronto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A recent $27.5-million class-action settlement involving a Toronto-area physician has left some neurologists concerned about potential damage to the specialty's reputation. The December settlement, the largest of its kind in Canadian medicolegal history, will see payments made to up to 15 000 patients who underwent electroencephalograms (EEGs) at 6 Toronto-area clinics between January 1990 and March 1996; about 75 of them subsequently developed hepatitis B. The clinics were operated by Dr. Ronald Wilson.

A subsequent investigation determined that the outbreak was caused by an infected technologist and inadequate infection control practices (see CMAJ 2000;162[8]:1127-31). That study concluded: “There were no written infection control procedures for any of the clinics. The technician reported that he did not wear gloves when conducting EEGs and … although [he] indicated that the use of needle electrodes rarely resulted in bleeding, patients' reports of bleeding were common.”

“Absolutely, we've been damaged by this,” said Dr. William Murphy of Calgary, a past president of the Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists. “Our profile is certainly harmed.”

Murphy says the case has also given many neurologists reason for pause. “I can't believe how one person can contaminate so many individuals.”

The case first gained public attention in 1996 after Toronto public health officials traced a hepatitis B outbreak to the EEG clinical technician employed by Wilson. He performed all EEGs done at the 6 clinics.

The infection rate among Wilson's patients was 600 times greater than normal. About 15 000 people who received EEGs during the 6-year period are expected to receive amounts ranging from $1000 to $130 000. Under the settlement, Wilson denied any responsibility for causing the problem. He still faces a hearing before the Ontario college.

Writing in CMAJ in 2000, the public health team that investigated the case concluded that guidelines were not followed at the Toronto clinics. “As stated in the guidelines,” it concluded, “it is preferable to use noninvasive techniques (e.g., disk electrodes) rather than invasive ones (e.g., subdermal electrodes).”

Dr. Gerald Tullio, a community neurologist at the William Osler Health Centre in Brampton, Ont., considers the case a wake-up call. He said he makes a point of opening new packages of electrodes in front of patients to help dispel any fears that products are being reused.

Tullio said many neurologists are worried about the impact the case will have on their malpractice fees, but Françoise Parent of the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) thinks the impact will be small because “assumptions [were] made about the cost of [this] class-action suit 6 years ago.” Ontario neurologists will pay $7116 for coverage in 2002.

o

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 3
5 Feb 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Huge class-action settlement worries neurologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Huge class-action settlement worries neurologists
Brad Mackay
CMAJ Feb 2002, 166 (3) 361-363;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Huge class-action settlement worries neurologists
Brad Mackay
CMAJ Feb 2002, 166 (3) 361-363;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical trainees warn practice permits will drive away doctors
  • Coupons for health care a sign of creeping privatization?
  • Canada’s health system is among the least green
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Neurology
    • Medicine & the law (including forensic medicine)
    • Hepatology

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire