Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

MP–MD angry after marijuana bill goes up in smoke

Louise Gagnon
CMAJ May 28, 2002 166 (11) 1452-1452-a;
Louise Gagnon
Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Alliance MP Keith Martin shattered parliamentary tradition in April because of his anger over the Liberals' use of a procedural manoeuvre to kill his private member's bill. The bill, which called for the decriminalization of marijuana possession, had been his pet project.

Figure1

Figure. Dr. Keith Martin maced the Commons Photo by: Canapress

“It's an unprecedented poison-pill amendment that prevents the bill from being brought forward and read,” said Martin, an emergency physician who has represented his BC riding in the House of Commons for 9 years. “The bill should have been voted on freely. It was an utter violation of our democratic rights as MPs.”

Martin was so angry that at one point he grabbed the ceremonial mace in the Commons — a serious violation of parliamentary tradition. He later apologized.

Bill C-344 would have made simple marijuana possession a minor civil offence rather than a criminal one — an idea several national organizations, including the CMA, have supported. The CMA says this would allow funds to be redirected from criminal prosecution to the treatment of addiction.

Under the current system, someone found guilty of “simple possession” (30 g or less) of marijuana receives a criminal record, faces up to 6 months in prison and a fine of up to $1000. Martin's bill, which was introduced in May 2001, would have made a first offence punishable by a fine of $200. This would increase to $500 for a second offence and to $1000 for all subsequent ones. According to Martin, more than half of MPs support decriminalization.

His bill made it to second reading before a Liberal motion to refer it to a special parliamentary committee effectively killed it. Government House Leader Ralph Goodale said the referral action was not “unreasonable.”

Martin says few private member's bills have been passed since the last federal election. In the current session of Parliament, only 3 bills have become law; all 3 came from the Senate and none involved a substantive issue. Not one of the 248 private member's proposed by MPs since this session of Parliament opened in 2001 has been passed.

“The system,” says Martin, “is designed to stop MPs from being innovative and constructive.” — Louise Gagnon, Ottawa

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 11
28 May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MP–MD angry after marijuana bill goes up in smoke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MP–MD angry after marijuana bill goes up in smoke
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ May 2002, 166 (11) 1452-1452-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
MP–MD angry after marijuana bill goes up in smoke
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ May 2002, 166 (11) 1452-1452-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What’s important to know about the new COVID-19 variants?
  • Women experts underrepresented in pandemic coverage
  • Feds update immunization advice with Moderna vaccine approval
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Pharmacology & toxicology
    • Medicine & the law (including forensic medicine)
    • Canadian government

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire