Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Centralizing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

Norman Kalant and Ian Shrier
CMAJ May 28, 2002 166 (11) 1397-1398;
Norman Kalant
*Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Que.; †Centre for Epidemiology and Community Studies, Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Shrier
*Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Que.; †Centre for Epidemiology and Community Studies, Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In its 2001 annual report on Canada's health care system, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discussed inverse relationships between the number of surgical procedures and the incidence of adverse post-operative events, for surgery in general and for coronary artery bypass grafting in particular.1 The Institute's president was quoted as saying “we have too many centres undertaking … heart surgery. The result may be unnecessary complications and … death.”2 Similarly, the chair of the Montreal regional health board stated “it's proven beyond a reasonable doubt that patient outcomes are better” at high-volume centres.2 A Quebec task force on tertiary cardiology recommended that centres each perform a minimum of 400 to 450 operations annually to maintain the quality of the service, without reference to supporting evidence.3 The policy implication of these statements is clear.

Does the evidence warrant such a degree of certainty? The report from the Canadian Institute for Health Information provides 3 references to support its position: 2 original research studies from the 1980s4,5 and a review article that provides details on only 1 of 10 studies reviewed.6 We are aware of 8 recent cohort studies that were not cited. Six of these reported mortality odds ratios for low- versus high-volume centres (low-volume centres treated fewer than 225 cases), and 5 had ratios very close to 1, which indicates an absence of a demonstrable volume–mortality relationship. For the other 2 cohorts, multiple regression analysis showed no volume effect on mortality after controlling for other factors. The odds ratios from early and recent cohorts together showed a linear progression over time, from –0.45 to 1. The most conservative conclusion at this time is that the available evidence does not provide a basis for a policy decision to centralize coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. It should be noted that these studies are concerned with hospital outcomes, not with those of individual surgeons.

We believe that there are 2 lessons to be learned. First, even highly regarded institutions may be subject to error or bias in presenting information. Sec- ond, bandwagons, buzzwords and self-interest often influence our thinking. Health care policymakers must avoid these effects and must base their decisions on careful review of the evidence, just as physicians are urged to do.

Norman Kalant Department of Medicine Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Que. Ian Shrier Centre for Epidemiology and Community Studies Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Que.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health care in Canada. Ottawa: The Institute; 2001.
  2. 2.↵
    Derfel A. Quebec lacks heart-specialty facilities: report. Montreal Gazette 2001 May 9.
  3. 3.↵
    Comité de travail de cardiologie tertiaire. Cardiologie tertiaire : situation actuelle, perspectives et propositions. Quebec City : Ministère de la santé et services sociaux; 2000.
  4. 4.↵
    Showstack JA, Rosenfeld KE, Garnick DW, Luft HS, Schaffarzick RW, Fowles J. Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA 1987;257:785-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Bernard H, O'Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between intrahospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care 1991; 29:1094-107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals. JAMA 2000;283:1159-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 166, Issue 11
28 May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Centralizing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Centralizing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Norman Kalant, Ian Shrier
CMAJ May 2002, 166 (11) 1397-1398;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Centralizing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Norman Kalant, Ian Shrier
CMAJ May 2002, 166 (11) 1397-1398;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Coexisting failures do not diminish the stature of a giant
  • Dare we hope
  • Highlighting obesity as a risk factor for endometrial cancer
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Cardiothoracic surgery

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire