Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

The ethics of anonymous chart reviews

Jacques Lemelin, William Hogg, Bruce Baskerville and Raphael Saginur
CMAJ August 21, 2001 165 (4) 399-401;
Jacques Lemelin
Associate Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Assistant Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Chair Research Ethics Board Ottawa Hospital — Civic Campus Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Hogg
Associate Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Assistant Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Chair Research Ethics Board Ottawa Hospital — Civic Campus Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Baskerville
Associate Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Assistant Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Chair Research Ethics Board Ottawa Hospital — Civic Campus Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raphael Saginur
Associate Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Assistant Professor Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont.; Chair Research Ethics Board Ottawa Hospital — Civic Campus Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Janusz Kaczorowski and John Sellors question the ethics of an anonymous chart review. Their concern seems to be the apparent inconsistency in our approach to obtaining consent: we obtained consent from physicians to participate in the study and from patients before their telephone interview but we did not obtain consent for patient chart reviews.1 Our approach is entirely consistent with the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, which states that researchers must obtain consent for physician participation in studies and for patient telephone interviews but not for chart reviews.2 Section 3, paragraph C, states that “secondary use of data refers to the use in research of data contained in records collected for a purpose other than the research itself. Common examples are patient or school records or biological specimens, originally produced for therapeutic for educational purposes, but now proposed for use in research. The issue becomes of concern only when data can be linked to individuals … in the published reports.”2

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario regularly performs chart audits in physicians' offices in an effort to ensure quality of care and patient safety. Hospitals are not only permitted but are obliged to perform chart audits to ensure quality of care and continuous quality improvement. Physicians are encouraged by their professional associations to carry out chart reviews on their practices. In none of these scenarios is patient consent requested.

Our study was designed to determine whether an outreach facilitation would improve the provision of evidence-based preventive care in family practice. We ensured that no data could be linked back to the 4600 patients in 46 practices whose charts were audited. Chart audit with feedback to the physician is a very effective way to change physician practice patterns. Requiring patient consent for anonymous chart audits would be expensive and complex. It would have a negative impact on the science from a societal perspective, and it is not clear what gain would be afforded in terms of patients' rights.

Rules on research ethics are designed to protect patients from harm. If these rules are to be changed, we should ensure that the changes would benefit patients and do no harm.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lemelin J, Hogg W, Baskerville N. Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care. CMAJ 2001;164(6): 757-63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Available: www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/policy.htm (accessed 2001 July 19).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 4
21 Aug 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The ethics of anonymous chart reviews
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The ethics of anonymous chart reviews
Jacques Lemelin, William Hogg, Bruce Baskerville, Raphael Saginur
CMAJ Aug 2001, 165 (4) 399-401;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The ethics of anonymous chart reviews
Jacques Lemelin, William Hogg, Bruce Baskerville, Raphael Saginur
CMAJ Aug 2001, 165 (4) 399-401;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
  • Observational evidence in support of screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire