Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Debating the criteria for brain death

Michael Potts
CMAJ August 07, 2001 165 (3) 269;
Michael Potts
Associate Professor of Philosophy Methodist College Fayetteville, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In reading the article by Neil Lazar and colleagues on brain death,1 I was reminded of a statement that Paul Byrne and colleagues made 18 years ago concerning the claims made by advocates of brain death criteria: “Stylized and highly repetitive, they rarely show freshness of expression or other evidence of personal rethinking or assimilation. The mere multiplication of such assertions does nothing to strengthen the position they indicate.”2 Lazar and colleagues rehash 2 claims of the 1981 US President's Commission report3: brain death implies a notion of irreversibly lost personhood and whole brain death implies that those brain functions necessary for the integrated functioning of the person are irreversibly lost.

I sympathize with the view that personhood is lost when the integrated unity of the human organism is lost; a number of philosophers have made a good case for this view.4,5 The second claim is the one that has clearly become problematic since the President's Commission report was published. Machine dependence does not imply the loss of integrated organic unity. A number of people who are clearly alive (and even conscious) depend on machines ranging from cardiac pacemakers to ventilators in order to live. In addition, there have been a number of cases of long-term survival of brain-dead patients. Lazar and colleagues themselves refer to cases of brain-dead pregnant women who have given birth to healthy infants. Even more remarkable are Alan Shewmon's reports of long-term survival of brain-dead children.6,7 Brain-dead patients have functioning circulatory and respiratory systems (with respiration being defined in terms of gas exchange and energy production at the cellular level). If life is defined in terms of the integrated functioning of a person, then brain-dead patients, whether they be declared whole brain or higher brain dead, are functioning integrated organisms and are thus living human people. If that is the case, the removal of unpaired vital organs from a beating-heart brain-dead patient means killing a living human person.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lazar NM, Shernie S, Webster GC, Dickens BM. Bioethics for clinicians: 24. Brain death. CMAJ 2001;164(6):833-6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Byrne PA, O'Reilly S, Quay PM, Salsich PW. Brain death: the patient, the physician, and society. Gonzaga Law Rev 1983;18:429-516.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining death: a report on the medical, legal, and ethical issues in the determination of death. Washington: The Commission; 1981.
  4. 4.↵
    Jones DA. Metaphysical misgivings about brain death. In: Potts M, Byrne PA, Nilges RG, editors. Beyond brain death: the case against brain based criteria for human death. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 92-119.
  5. 5.↵
    Moreland JP, Rae SB. Body and soul: human nature and the crisis in ethics. Downers Grove (IL): Intervarsity Press; 2000.
  6. 6.↵
    Shewmon DA. Brainstem death, brain death and death: a critical re-evaluation of the purported evidence. Issues Law Med 1998;14:125-45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Shewmon DA. Chronic brain death: meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. Neurology 1998;51:1538-45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 3
7 Aug 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Debating the criteria for brain death
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Debating the criteria for brain death
Michael Potts
CMAJ Aug 2001, 165 (3) 269;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Debating the criteria for brain death
Michael Potts
CMAJ Aug 2001, 165 (3) 269;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New criteria for female athlete triad syndrome?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Virtual care and emergency department use
  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire