Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Preventive Health Care

Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

CMAJ July 24, 2001 165 (2) 206-208;
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Recommendations
  • For asymptomatic people with no personal history of ulcerative colitis, polyps or colorectal cancer.

  • People at normal risk: There is good evidence to include annual or biennial fecal occult blood testing (grade A recommendation) and fair evidence to include flexible sigmoidoscopy (grade B recommendation) in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic people over 50 years of age. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations about whether only one or both tests should be performed (grade C recommendation). There is insufficient evidence to include or exclude colonoscopy as an initial screening test in the periodic health examination of people in this age group (grade C recommendation).

  • People at above-average risk: There is fair evidence to include either genetic testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of people in kindreds with familial adenomatous polyposis (grade B recommendation). There is fair evidence to include colonoscopy screening in the periodic health examination of patients in kindreds with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (grade B recommendation). There is insufficient evidence to recommend colonoscopy for people who have a family history of colorectal polyps or cancer but who do not meet the criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (grade C recommendation).

In Canada colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer, accounting for more than 12% of cases of cancer in both sexes. It was estimated that there would be 17 000 new cases and 6500 deaths from colorectal cancer in Canada in 2000.1 These rates, particularly among men, are among the highest in the world. People in kindreds with familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer have close to a 50% chance of acquiring colorectal cancer because of the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance of these syndromes. Similarly, people with a family history of colorectal cancer who do not meet the criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer or familial adenomatous polyposis may be at increased risk, but that risk is less well defined.

Manoeuvres

People at normal risk

• Multiphasic screening with fecal occult blood test as first phase

• Multiphase screening with sigmoidoscopy

• Uniphase screening with colonoscopy

People at above-average risk

• Flexible sigmoidoscopy or genetic testing for people in kindreds with familial adenomatous polyposis

• Colonoscopy for people in kindreds with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

• Colonoscopy for people with a family history (first-degree relative) of polyps or colorectal cancer

Potential benefits

• Reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer

Potential harms

• Sequelae of false-positive or false-negative results from fecal occult blood tests (e.g., unnecessary investigations and false reassurance)

• Perforation (sigmoidoscopy 1.4 per 10 000 procedures; colonoscopy 10 per 10 000 procedures); bleeding

• Anxiety, poor compliance

Recommendations by others

The Ontario Expert Panel on Colorectal Cancer recommends a multiphasic screening program, beginning with fecal occult blood testing, for people at normal risk between the ages of 50 and 75 years.2 The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening with either annual fecal occult blood testing or sigmoidoscopy (interval unspecified) or both for people over 50 years.3 A number of groups in the United States, including the American Cancer Society, the American College of Gastroenterology, the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America and the Oncology Nursing Society, recommend screening with fecal occult blood testing annually, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, combined fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema every 5–10 years or colonoscopy every 10 years for people aged 50 or older with no other risk factors.4 These groups also made recommendations for people with additional risk factors: genetic counselling and possible genetic testing for those at risk of familial adenomatous polyposis and, for people with positive genetic test results, flexible sigmoidoscopy beginning at puberty. For people in kindreds with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, annual colonoscopy beginning between 20 and 30 years of age is recommended. These groups made screening recommendations for people with a family history of polyps or colon cancer similar to those for people at normal risk but beginning at age 40 rather than 50.

The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care is an independent panel funded through a partnership of the federal and provincial/territorial governments of Canada.

This statement is based on the technical report “Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening strategies for colorectal cancer,” by Robin S. McLeod, with the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. The full technical report is available from the task force office (ctf{at}ctfphc.org).

Evidence and clinical summary
  • Although there is good evidence (from randomized controlled trials) to include screening with the fecal occult blood test in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic people over 50 years of age,5,6,7,8 concerns remain about the high rate of false-positive results, feasibility and small clinical benefit of such screening. The number needed to screen for 10 years to avert 1 death from colorectal cancer is 1173.

  • There is fair evidence to include screening with sigmoidoscopy,9,10,11 but it is unclear whether to perform one or both of fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.12,13,14

  • There is no direct evidence that colonoscopy is an effective screening manoeuvre in people at normal risk, even though it is the best method for detecting adenomas and carcinomas. It may not be feasible to screen these people because of poor compliance, the expertise and equipment required and the potential costs. However, if colonoscopy were an effective screening strategy when performed less frequently, these issues might be of less concern.15,16

  • Genetic testing is indicated for people at risk for familial adenomatous polyposis, followed by flexible sigmoidoscopy in those carrying the mutation.17,18 People from families in which the gene mutation has been identified but who do not carry the mutation themselves require screening similar to that for people at normal risk. For people at risk where the mutation has not been identified in the family, or where genetic testing is unavailable, screening with annual or biannual flexible sigmoidoscopy should start at puberty. In all instances, genetic counselling should be performed before genetic testing.

  • For people from families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colonoscopy rather than sigmoidoscopy is recommended (level III evidence).19 Although higher levels of evidence are usually required to give a grade B recommendation, it is unlikely that more rigorous studies could be performed in these patients given the high risk of cancer and relative infrequency of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. The age at which screening should begin and the frequency with which colonoscopy should be performed are unclear.

  • People who have only 1 or 2 first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer require screening similar to that for people at normal risk.

  • Because most screening options are multiphasic, adequate infrastructure is required to support implementation, and to assure quality control and optimal and timely follow-up of screened individuals.

Identification of people at increased risk of colon cancer
  • Familial adenomatous polyposis

  • • Multiple adenomatous polyps progressively develop throughout the colon.

  • • Polyps first appear after puberty.

  • • Other benign and malignant lesions, including gastric and duodenal polyps, desmoid tumours, osteomas and retinal lesions, occur with variable frequency.

  • Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

  • • This cancer is typified by the presence of multiple family members affected with cancer, including cancers of the colon and rectum as well as the endometrium, stomach, small bowel, pancreas, ovary, ureter and renal pelvis in some families. Amsterdam criteria: 3 family members affected with colorectal cancer, 2 of whom are in successive generations and at least 1 is under the age of 45 years.20

  • • Colorectal cancers tend to be right sided, occur at an early age, have poor prognostic histological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous) and are more advanced at presentation.

  • Family history

  • • People who have 2 or more first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer have an increased, age-adjusted relative risk of colorectal cancer.

References

  1. 1.↵
    National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics 2000. Toronto: The Institute; 2000.
  2. 2.↵
    Ontario Expert Panel on Colorectal Cancer. Colorectal cancer screening: final report of the Ontario Expert Panel. Toronto: The Panel, Cancer Care Ontario; 1999. p. 28-31. Available (pdf format): www.cancercare.on.ca/colorectal.pdf (accessed 2001 June 15).
  3. 3.↵
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer. Guide to clinical preventive services. Alexandria (VA): International Medical Publishing; 1996. p. 89-103.
  4. 4.↵
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, ,Godlee F, Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997;112(2):594-642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(5):434-37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348(9040):1467-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Hardcastle JD, Thomas WM, Chamberlain J, Pye G, Sheffield J, James PD et al. Randomised, controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Results for first 107,349 subjects. Lancet 1989;1(8648):1160-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Kewenter J, Bjork S, Haglind E, Smith L, Svanvik J, Ahren C. Screening and rescreening for colorectal cancer. A controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing in 27,700 subjects. Cancer 1988;62(3):645-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Friedman GD, Collen MF, Fireman BH. Multiphasic health checkup evaluation: a 16-year follow-up. J Chronic Dis 1986;39(6):453-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84(20):1572-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case–control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med 1995;155(16):1741-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Verne JE, Aubrey R, Love SB, Talbot IC, Northover JM. Population based randomized study of uptake and yield of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by faecal occult blood testing. BMJ 1998;317: 182-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Berry DP, Clarke P, Hardcastle JD, Vellacott KD. Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to faecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening. Br J Surg 1997;84(9):1274-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Rasmussen M, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jorgensen OD. Possible advantages and drawbacks of adding flexible sigmoidoscopy to hemoccult-II in screening for colorectal cancer. A randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34: 73-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328 (19): 1365-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, et al. The effect of fecal occult blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1603-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Bulow S, Bulow C, Nielsen TF, Karlsen L, Moesgaard F. Centralized registration, prophylactic examination, and treatment results in improved prognosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Results from the Danish Polyposis Register. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30(10):989-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Powell SM, Petersen GM, Krush AJ, Booker S, Jen J, Giardiello FM, et al. Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med 1993;329(27):1982-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Burke W, Petersen G, Lynch P, Botkin J, Daly M, Garber J, et al. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 1997;277(11):915-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1453-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 2
24 Jul 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
CMAJ Jul 2001, 165 (2) 206-208;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
CMAJ Jul 2001, 165 (2) 206-208;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Manoeuvres
    • People at above-average risk
    • Potential benefits
    • Potential harms
    • Recommendations by others
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide
  • Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care
  • Small-area variation in screening for cancer, glucose and cholesterol in Ontario: a cross-sectional study
  • Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes
  • Screening rates for colorectal cancer in Canada: a cross-sectional study
  • Ontario's ColonCancerCheck: Results from Canada's First Province-Wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
  • ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: Patient perceptions
  • Cancer screening practices of cancer survivors: Population-based, longitudinal study
  • Screening for colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia in kidney transplant recipients: cross sectional prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study of faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin and colonoscopy
  • The cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer
  • Fecal occult blood testing: People in Ontario are unaware of it and not ready for it
  • Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening
  • Perception versus reality: Overcoming barriers to colorectal cancer screening
  • Cancer Screening in Renal Transplant Recipients: What Is the Evidence?
  • Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening
  • Long-Term Solid Cancer Risk Among 5-Year Survivors of Hodgkin's Lymphoma
  • Colon cancer screening.
  • Colorectal cancer screening: practices and attitudes of gastroenterologists, internists and surgeons
  • Common sense for a common problem: the question of screening the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia
  • Family History Assessment to Detect Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: Conceptual Considerations and a Preliminary Economic Analysis
  • Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: a population-based retrospective cohort study
  • Is computed tomographic colonography effective for colorectal cancer screening?
  • New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
  • Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: Why not consider nurse endoscopists?
  • Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: It's time to act
  • Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
  • Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
  • Primary care -- the hard parts
  • Soins primaires - les cotes difficiles
  • Colorectal cancer screening: you can't be positive about a negative result
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Screening for otitis media with effusion: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
  • Varicella vaccination: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Show more Preventive Health Care

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire