Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Promoting effective guideline use in Ontario

Walter W. Rosser, Dave Davis, Erin Gilbart and on behalf of the Guideline Advisory Committee
CMAJ July 24, 2001 165 (2) 181-182;
Walter W. Rosser
Dr. Rosser is a member of the Ontario Guideline Advisory Committee (GAC) and is Chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Dr. Davis is Chair of the GAC and is Associate Dean, Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Ms. Gilbart is Research and Administrative Coordinator for the GAC and is with the Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Davis
Dr. Rosser is a member of the Ontario Guideline Advisory Committee (GAC) and is Chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Dr. Davis is Chair of the GAC and is Associate Dean, Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Ms. Gilbart is Research and Administrative Coordinator for the GAC and is with the Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Gilbart
Dr. Rosser is a member of the Ontario Guideline Advisory Committee (GAC) and is Chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Dr. Davis is Chair of the GAC and is Associate Dean, Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Ms. Gilbart is Research and Administrative Coordinator for the GAC and is with the Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dr. Rosser is a member of the Ontario Guideline Advisory Committee (GAC) and is Chair of the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Dr. Davis is Chair of the GAC and is Associate Dean, Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Ms. Gilbart is Research and Administrative Coordinator for the GAC and is with the Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) negotiate 3-year agreements for funding medical services in Ontario. The quality of care provided to the population of Ontario and accountability regarding the utilization of services paid for by the system is of interest to both parties. During the 1997 negotiations, it was agreed that a committee with 3 representatives from the ministry, 3 from the OMA and 1 ex-officio member of the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences should be formed to promote the adoption of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in the province and to consult widely with the profession in the process. The Guideline Advisory Committee (GAC) was thus established; it reports to the Physician Services Committee, another joint initiative resulting from the negotiations.

In this article we describe the methods that have been developed over the last 4 years to identify well-developed guidelines and some of the strategies being proposed for their dissemination, implementation and evaluation.

Clinical practice guidelines are “systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances.”1 Practice guidelines have become widely available through Internet technology. Most guidelines are produced by specific interest groups and are disseminated by publication in a medical journal or by traditional mail; however, seldom have guidelines had any noticeable impact on clinical practice.2 The large volume of guidelines creates confusion for practitioners, who often follow none of them because of the time required to assess the quality of each.3 The GAC thus determined that its first priority was to identify the highest quality guidelines available on selected topics and then to promote their dissemination across the province.

In producing a list of priority topics for guideline assessment, the committee took the following factors into account: feedback from the OMA sections indicated that there was considerable confusion for practitioners over conflicting advice for appropriate practice; utilization data from the ministry demonstrated that the use of numerous procedures had increased rapidly over previous years; and feedback from practising physicians identified areas in which they felt that there was a need for guidelines to aid practice.

Literature searches were then conducted by librarians at the University of Toronto to find all English-language guidelines published in the past 10 years on specific topics (10 primary care areas were initially identified, including asthma, otitis media, osteoporosis and depression). Various associations and interest groups in Ontario were contacted to determine whether there were any unpublished guidelines. After attempts to develop its own scoring methodology to assess the quality of guidelines, the GAC decided to adapt the Appraisal Instrument for Clinical Guidelines.4 This instrument has been validated internationally and consists of 37 items addressing 3 dimensions: rigour of development, context and content, and application.

Recognizing that it would be controversial to recommend guidelines on the basis of the quality of the process by which they were produced, the GAC felt that it was important to develop a rigorous and objective process to determine which guidelines should be recommended. Fellows from the University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine and community-based family physician volunteers from the OMA were brought together in 3 workshops. Each workshop, attended by 10–20 participants, involved a half-day session on the objectives of the GAC and how to assess and validate guideline scores. At the end of the session interested participants were provided with an additional 5 guidelines to assess in the subsequent 2 weeks. Their appraisals were evaluated for consistency and interrater reliability. To date, 34 trained assessors are reviewing guidelines. Each guideline is evaluated by 3 independent assessors, and guidelines identified as warranting further review are assessed for clinical relevance. Over 250 published guidelines addressing 25 clinical areas are currently being assessed. Recommended guidelines in the initial 10 clinical areas are available on the GAC Web site (www.gacguidelines.ca).

The GAC anticipates that guidelines found to be of excellent quality but not convenient for use in clinical practice will need to be reformatted into user-friendly summaries. Volunteer physicians from the community will be asked to evaluate such summaries and provide feedback for improvement. Only the most rigorously developed guidelines will be posted on the Web site in the form of structured abstracts, although interested practitioners can obtain the scores of other guidelines reviewed in a particular clinical area.

Continuing medical education (CME) literature on dissemination strategies indicates that a single method, such as mass mailing, has a minimal effect on changing medical practice.3 The GAC is currently considering a number of options to enhance the dissemination of the best available guidelines.

One option is the Ontario Guideline Collaborative, a group of representatives from provincial licensing bodies, government, university and hospital sectors that convenes 3–4 times per year to discuss dissemination and implementation of recommended guidelines. Other provincial initiatives of interest include a community-based intervention strategy developed by the Partners for Appropriate Anti-Infective Community Therapy to disseminate guidelines on the appropriate use of anti-infectives:5 using the train-the-trainer model, opinion leaders from 50 communities across Ontario have been prepared to implement the program in their respective regions. The GAC is considering using this model to disseminate a chosen guideline on 3 or 4 occasions during the year.

Over the past 10 years more than 3000 small groups of physicians have been formed to work together over carefully prepared, evidence-based materials designed to improve practice on a variety of topics. Participants select the topic of most interest to the group and meet to determine how they could modify their practice according to the evidence presented.6 Adapting this format of the practice-based small group CME session offers the GAC a further strategy for guideline dissemination.

The Ontario College of Family Physicians has developed a train-the-trainer method of facilitating small groups adapting new practice strategies.7 Identifying evidence-based guidelines and modifying them to fit the template produced for this program is yet another potential dissemination strategy for the GAC.

From the current CME literature, we believe that the combination of initiatives in Ontario has the potential to improve clinical practice in the province. The GAC hopes to use provincial data sets to measure the impact of particular guideline dissemination strategies on physician practices. We look forward to reporting on the results of these projects as they unfold.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Physician Services Committee and the Guideline Advisory Committee as well as the Ontario Medical Association and the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care for their support in these initiatives.

Footnotes

  • Contributors: Dr. Rosser was the primary author, contributed to the conception and design, and reviewed subsequent revisions. Dr. Davis and Ms. Gilbart contributed to the writing of the article and reviewed subsequent revisions.

    Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine. In: Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington: National Academy Press; 1990. p. 38.
  2. 2.↵
    Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ 1997;156(12): 1705-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997;157(4):408-16. Abstract available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-157/issue-4/0408.htm
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw J, Feder G, Moran S. Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:21-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Stewart J, Pilla J, Dunn L. Pilot study for appropriate anti-infective community therapy. Effect of a guideline based strategy to optimize use of antibiotics. Can Fam Physician 2000;46:851-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Premi J, Shannon S, Hartwick K, Lamb S, Wakefield J, Williams J. Practice-based small group CME. Acad Med 1994;69(10):800-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Ontario College of Family Physicians. Peer presenter model for continuing medical education. Toronto: The College. Available: www.cfpc.ca/ocfp/cme/pppmodel.html (accessed 2001 June 22).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 2
24 Jul 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Promoting effective guideline use in Ontario
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Promoting effective guideline use in Ontario
Walter W. Rosser, Dave Davis, Erin Gilbart, on behalf of the Guideline Advisory Committee
CMAJ Jul 2001, 165 (2) 181-182;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Promoting effective guideline use in Ontario
Walter W. Rosser, Dave Davis, Erin Gilbart, on behalf of the Guideline Advisory Committee
CMAJ Jul 2001, 165 (2) 181-182;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preface
  • Nutritional advice in Canadian family practice
  • Le moment est venu de desherber le jardin des guides de pratique:
  • Time to weed the CPG garden
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ensuring timely genetic diagnosis in adults
  • The case for improving the detection and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea following stroke
  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire