Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Ontario, Quebec compare views on medicare

Susan Pinker
CMAJ November 13, 2001 165 (10) 1378-1378-a;
Susan Pinker
Montreal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A recent town-hall meeting in Montreal gave 2 high-profile experts a chance to compare notes as the 30th birthday of Canada's medicare system approaches.

The get-together, sponsored by the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, featured Duncan Sinclair, chair of Ontario's Health Services Restructuring Commission, and Michel Clair, chair of Quebec's Commission on Health and Social Services. Both reflected on their work evaluating those 2 systems. Antonia Maioni, the institute's new director, served as moderator.

The event was just a taste of what's to come. In February 2002 the institute is focusing its annual conference on providing a full review of Canada's health care system. “The idea is to gather together policy-makers, people from the medical community, representatives from institutions, academics and the public to look at the system and separate false problems from real ones,” said Maioni. “We want to start with the perception that the system is now a generation old.”

Although the composition of their commissions was different, as were the health infrastructures they studied, Maioni said Clair and Sinclair “went through the same process and came to some of the same conclusions.”

But there were some fundamental distinctions between the report cards delivered by their commissions. Sinclair said that even though the Ontario commission was supposed to operate at arm's length from government, there was a public perception of government influence. However, he noted that if there had been no true exchange between his commission and the health ministry on budget issues the commission's recommendations would have been hollow.

“Until the government made corresponding reinvestment in certain sectors, we might as well just whistle in the wind,” he said.

When it came to his commission's strong push toward reinvestment in home care, added Sinclair, “it just didn't happen.” Similarly, the commission's call for increased funding for community-based mental health services has resulted in “very halting progress.” On the bright side, there was substantial reinvestment in long-term care and the beginning of a more coordinated approach to managing health information more efficiently.

Sinclair concluded that his commission was worthwhile because it challenged expectations on how the system should work. Quoting Northrop Frye, Sinclair likened efforts to reform health care to the creation of a moraine, “which is of very high quality but laid down with agonizing slowness.”

Clair had a more upbeat view. Starting with the mandate of his commission to hold a public debate, Clair reported that its members did valuable work within a very tight timeline. The commission's suggestions started with a new approach to human resources that focuses on “planning and good governance,” said Clair, and a system that is responsive to regional, not centralized, needs. Even more important is the creation of “a culture aspiring to excellence and innovation — which is the opposite of protecting the status quo.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 10
13 Nov 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ontario, Quebec compare views on medicare
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ontario, Quebec compare views on medicare
Susan Pinker
CMAJ Nov 2001, 165 (10) 1378-1378-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ontario, Quebec compare views on medicare
Susan Pinker
CMAJ Nov 2001, 165 (10) 1378-1378-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire