Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Family medicine loses lustre as students “vote with feet” in 2001 residency match

Patrick Sullivan
CMAJ April 17, 2001 164 (8) 1194;
Patrick Sullivan
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Mar. 12 was “match day” for Canada's medical students, and for Canadian communities pleading for family doctors the news wasn't very good.

Family medicine emerged from the first round of the 2001 residency match with 19% of its 476 openings unfilled. Although many of those 91 vacancies have since been filled by graduates of foreign schools, Sandra Banner thinks the results point to serious problems within a specialty that used to be very popular. “Students appear to be voting with their feet,” says Banner, executive director of the Canadian Resident Matching Service. At Dalhousie University alone, 21 of the 41 family medicine slots sat empty after the first round. The news was almost as dismal for specialized programs in rural family medicine, for which one-third of positions went unfilled.

CMA President Peter Barrett says those results didn't come as a complete surprise, since “concern has been growing about this over the past year.”

Dr. Paul Rainsberry, director of education with the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), says the college has responded by helping to prepare a questionnaire for 2001 match participants. It will also organize focus groups to gain medical students' opinions. “Something about family medicine as a career is not as attractive as it once was,” he says.

Rainsberry adds that the shortage of FPs is now so severe that family doctors can set up shop in underserviced cities without having to venture near a remote community. This helps explain why 14 of 20 new rural medicine slots in Alberta were unfilled after the first round.

Rainsberry says the college is worried that a trend is developing, since the number of vacant positions has increased every year since 1997, when there were 10.

Dr. Carol Herbert, dean of medicine and dentistry at the University of Western Ontario, thinks the problem is not the number of unfilled slots but the number of Canadian-trained medical students available to fill all positions. (This year, there were 77 more residency slots in Canada than there were Canadian-trained students to fill them.) “Across Canada, we matched only 8 fewer students to family medicine than last year,” she says. “The large number of unmatched positions reflects in part that a substantial number of positions have been added but the number of [Canadian-trained] medical school graduates remained the same.”

Herbert does agree that family medicine has to sell itself to students. “It needs to advertise itself as a wonderful career path. With all of the press about the difficult lot of family physicians, especially in rural communities, it is little wonder that students choose a different path.

“The future of the system depends upon committed, energetic young physicians who will drive change in primary care.”

Banner says the 2001 match is good news for 500 international medical graduates (IMGs) who trained outside Canada and applied for the 2001 match, since there were 153 vacancies after the first round — 91 in family medicine and the rest in medical and surgical specialties. IMGs aren't guaranteed clear sailing, since there are limits on residency applications from them in some provinces, but Banner says “it looks like the doors are opening.”

Ilana Porzecanski, a Canadian studying medicine at University College Dublin (CMAJ 2000;162:869), thinks the latest match “not only increases opportunities for Canadian IMGs but also increases opportunities for foreign-trained physicians now living in Canada as citizens or landed immigrants.” (Such immigrants need Canadian training in order to practise here.)

“Residency positions should be filled on the basis of the best qualified applicant,” she says. “This means using a common denominator to compare applicants, and the MCCQE 1 [qualifying examination] is the ideal tool for this because everyone who wants to practise in Canada has to write it.”

The 2001 match was full of surprises:

· Eight of the 37 positions in orthopedic surgery remained unfilled on match day. This is the first time there has been an opening since a single spot went unfilled in 1997; the number of spots available has remained constant.

· Anesthesia, one of the most popular specialties in 2001, was one of the least popular just 5 years ago. “Anesthesia was a real surprise,” says Banner. “Seventy-six applicants made it their first choice, and there were only 58 spots.” She noted that 22% of students unmatched after the first round chose only anesthesia.

· The popularity of obstetrics and gynecology continues to wane, with 20% of residency slots remaining unfilled. In psychiatry, 9 of 79 slots went unfilled.

Banner hopes the survey of match participants being prepared with cooperation from the CFPC will provide a hint about family medicine's lost lustre. “Maybe hospital-based practices with more regular hours are more in line with today's lifestyle choices,” she says.

Meanwhile, the 2001 results left her shaking her head. “When 20% of family medicine positions go unmatched,” she says, “we've entered uncharted territory.”

Figure

Figure. Ilana Porzecanski: Doors opening for Canadians who train abroad? Photo by: Courtesy Ilana Porzecanski

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 164, Issue 8
17 Apr 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family medicine loses lustre as students “vote with feet” in 2001 residency match
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Family medicine loses lustre as students “vote with feet” in 2001 residency match
Patrick Sullivan
CMAJ Apr 2001, 164 (8) 1194;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Family medicine loses lustre as students “vote with feet” in 2001 residency match
Patrick Sullivan
CMAJ Apr 2001, 164 (8) 1194;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The impact of interest: How do family medicine interest groups influence medical students?
  • Choosing family medicine
  • Choosing family medicine
  • Just a family doc
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire