Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Harm reduction or reducing harm?

Colin Mangham
CMAJ January 23, 2001 164 (2) 173-173-a;
Colin Mangham
Director Prevention Source BC Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I am concerned that readers of the June 13, 2000, special issue of CMAJ on substance abuse may think that harm reduction is the central tenet of Canadian drug policy. While aspects of harm reduction have merit under specific conditions, I am deeply concerned that some truths are missing from the articles in this issue.

Although Canada's Drug Strategy1 does advocate reducing the “harm associated with alcohol and other drugs to individuals, families, and communities,” its first sentence states that “Canada's drug strategy reflects a balance between reducing the supply of drugs and reducing the demand for drugs.”1 Neither of these 2 chief aims of Canada's drug strategy can be called harm reduction as defined in the CMAJ articles. Reducing harm should not be confused with harm reduction.

The articles also neglect to point out that demand reduction — preventing use in the first place and reducing the number of users — not only is central to the strategy but in fact constitutes the most cost-effective intervention.1 Instead, the articles give the impression that harm reduction — reducing harms without focusing on consumption —should form the crux of drug policy. Adopting harm reduction as the flagship for drug policy is neither compassionate nor visionary. It is simply a classic case of cop-out realism.

The articles tend to downplay the seriousness of illicit drug use, citing low incidences and the relatively greater economic costs of tobacco and alcohol. Low incidence does not necessarily mean a lesser problem. Harm reduction, adopted as an umbrella strategy, would simply widen the envelope of what drug use is considered acceptable. The message this strategy would send future generations alone cancels any benefits that I could envision.

Small ‘h’ harm reduction, in the form of specific strategies to help specific groups avoid harm while working toward abstinence or nonproblematic use (if such exists), does need to be considered. However, we should continue to concentrate on preventing drug use, making treatment much more comprehensive and accessible and sticking with drug users over the long haul of rehabilitation.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    Interdepartmental Working Group on Substance Abuse. Canada's drug strategy. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1998. Available: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/alcohol-otherdrugs/publications.htm (accessed 24 Nov 2000).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 164, Issue 2
23 Jan 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Harm reduction or reducing harm?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Harm reduction or reducing harm?
Colin Mangham
CMAJ Jan 2001, 164 (2) 173-173-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Harm reduction or reducing harm?
Colin Mangham
CMAJ Jan 2001, 164 (2) 173-173-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire