Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Changing course in electronic seas: rapid publication of brief recommendation statements by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

John W. Feightner
CMAJ June 26, 2001 164 (13) 1856;
John W. Feightner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Since its inception (originally as the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination) the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care has provided rigourous reviews of the scientific literature on clinical prevention. On the basis of the systematic reviews, this expert panel generates evidence-based recommendations covering important aspects of prevention in medical practice and public health. To date, over 90 specific problems have been evaluated, and the work is continuing.

The usual process has been to publish the task force reports in medical journals, usually CMAJ. The first report was published in 1979.1 The task force has also published a book, the Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care.2 However, new opportunities are presented with the increasing reach of the Web (data from the CMA's 2000 Physician Resource Questionnaire showed that 72% of physicians had access to the Internet and, of these, 78% used the Web on a daily or weekly basis;3 preliminary data from the CMA's 2001 survey indicate that 83% of physicians have access to the Internet).

Beginning in this issue (see page 1888)4 the task force will publish summary recommendation statements in CMAJ for recommendations of interest to physicians. On occasion, and for selected topics, the task force will publish its recommendations together with the in-depth review (e.g., the report on breast self-examination published in this issue [see page 1837]5). The full technical reports of the systematic reviews and recommendations will be available from the task force office (see the end of this article for contact information), and structured abstracts of the full reports will be posted online (www.ctfphc.org). Also, authors of the systematic reviews upon which the recommendations are based will be encouraged to submit the reports to peer-reviewed, indexed journals.

We have made this change for 2 important reasons. First, we want the task force's recommendations to be made available as quickly as possible. In the past, publication was delayed, often for a considerable time, while the technical report underwent editing to a size manageable by most print journals and then went through a process culminating in peer-reviewed publication. In the interim, new evidence was sometimes published, the evaluation of which could further delay publication. The new process means the evidence is likely to be current when the recommendations are published, and it allows the authors of the systematic reviews more freedom to select journals to which to submit, and to update their reviews if new evidence emerges in the interim. Second, these new summary statements focus on practice recommendations and clinically relevant information, which will help busy clinicians get to the “bottom line” quickly.

On behalf of the task force, I hope you will find this new format useful, and I welcome your comments.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination. CMAJ 1979;121(9):1193-254.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care. Ottawa: Canada Communications Group; 1994.
  3. 3.↵
    Physician Resource Questionnaire. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association; 2000. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-163/issue-5/prq/index.htm
  4. 4.↵
    Varicella vaccination. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. CMAJ 2001;164(13):1888-9. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-164/issue-13/1888.asp
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Baxter N, with the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: Should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? CMAJ 2001;164(13):1837-46. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-164/issue-13/1837.asp
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 164, Issue 13
26 Jun 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changing course in electronic seas: rapid publication of brief recommendation statements by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Changing course in electronic seas: rapid publication of brief recommendation statements by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
John W. Feightner
CMAJ Jun 2001, 164 (13) 1856;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Changing course in electronic seas: rapid publication of brief recommendation statements by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
John W. Feightner
CMAJ Jun 2001, 164 (13) 1856;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Transforming race-based health research in Canada
  • Not neutral: reimagining antiracism as a professional competence
  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Sections
    • Guidelines
  • Topics
    • Patient education
    • Journalology & publication ethics
    • Health technology

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire