Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Lithotripsy comes to Ottawa ... at last

John E. Mahoney
CMAJ June 26, 2001 164 (13) 1833-1835;
John E. Mahoney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

In July 2000 the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care announced that it would fully fund a lithotripsy program in Ottawa. I write to alert readers to the complexity of getting things done with this ministry and to thank the many people who helped to finally bring lithotripsy therapy to Eastern Ontario.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for the management of ureteric calculi became available in the early 1980s; 2 machines were in operation in Ontario by 1989, in Toronto and London.

Until recently, lithotripsy was not available in Ontario east of Toronto. Patients in the Ottawa region were required to travel at their own expense to Toronto, London or Montreal for treatment. The waiting time for urgent therapy in Montreal was 2 weeks.

In 1996 my colleagues and I applied to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to make extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy available in Ottawa. At that time Ottawa was the largest city in North America without a lithotripsy machine. The ministry refused our request, citing the capital investment to purchase the machine, the ongoing maintenance costs and the fact that Toronto and London could handle the patient load.

Because the ministry's refusal was based primarily on cost, we responded by carefully monitoring the cost of treating Ottawa-area patients with more invasive procedures at the Ottawa Hospital – General Campus. We showed that by offering lithotripsy to just 250 patients per year (of an estimated 700 eligible patients per year from this region) we would in fact save money.

Our greatest concern was that patients in Ottawa were being treated more invasively than other patients in Ontario because of the lack of local lithotripsy services. Further, it appears that many patients would rather subject themselves to more invasive and risky surgery close to home than travel to another city for less invasive treatment. Although we find this astonishing, we suspect that the situation is similar in other areas of medicine. For hundreds of cancer patients across Canada, travelling to another location is the only way to receive timely treatment.1 In Toronto, it has been shown that cancer patients faced with the need to travel to obtain radiotherapy prefer to postpone radiotherapy than to endure the hardships of leaving their families and local support.2

We presented our findings to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in the summer of 1997. We also told the ministry staff that Ontario was being charged $1080 each time a patient from Eastern Ontario was treated with lithotripsy in Montreal. We estimated that we could provide lithotripsy in Ottawa at half the cost of the transfer payment, reduce waiting times and morbidity, and eliminate almost all of the indirect costs to the patient for travel.

The ministry officials appeared to view our proposal favourably. At their request, we forwarded detailed plans for the lithotripsy unit. We did not receive a formal response from the ministry. With money donated to the Ottawa Hospital Foundation, we purchased a lithotripsy machine in the summer of 1999. We then received a crushing blow: the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care informed us that it would not provide funds to operate the machine. Further, the ministry stated that it would deduct from the hospital's global budget any hospital money spent on the delivery of lithotripsy. Lastly, the ministry informed us that it would not allow urologists to bill the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) for professional fees for lithotripsy performed in Ottawa. The actions of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care were punitive. We later learned that the ministry also reduced by half the transfer payment for lithotripsy services performed in Quebec. (At least our research saved the Ontario government some money.)

However, after more pressure from politicians and patients, the government has now agreed to fund our lithotripsy machine and I am pleased to report that patients started to receive this therapy in Ottawa in March 2001. I would advise physicians dealing with the Ontario government on funding for new programs to be prepared for a long battle.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Priest L. Canada's long wait: “It's a disgrace.” Globe and Mail 2000 Jan 15; Sect A:15.
  2. 2.↵
    Priest L. Toronto hospital closes its doors to new cancer patients. Globe and Mail 2000 Jan 20.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 164, Issue 13
26 Jun 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lithotripsy comes to Ottawa ... at last
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lithotripsy comes to Ottawa ... at last
John E. Mahoney
CMAJ Jun 2001, 164 (13) 1833-1835;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Lithotripsy comes to Ottawa ... at last
John E. Mahoney
CMAJ Jun 2001, 164 (13) 1833-1835;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Eliminating racism in research
  • Transitioning to outpatient arthroplasty during COVID-19: time to pivot
  • Systemic absorption of intranasal corticosteroids may occur and can potentially affect the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Areas of Focus
    • Health services
  • Topics
    • Urology
    • Nephrology
    • Health economics

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire