Review
Problems for clinical judgement: 4. Surviving in the report card era
Jack V. Tu, Michael J. Schull, Lorraine E. Ferris, Janet E. Hux and Donald A. Redelmeier
CMAJ June 12, 2001 164 (12) 1709-1712;
Jack V. Tu
From the *Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the †Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the ‡Departments of Health Administration and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and the §Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Michael J. Schull
From the *Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the †Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the ‡Departments of Health Administration and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and the §Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Lorraine E. Ferris
From the *Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the †Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the ‡Departments of Health Administration and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and the §Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Janet E. Hux
From the *Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the †Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the ‡Departments of Health Administration and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and the §Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Donald A. Redelmeier
From the *Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the †Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.; the ‡Departments of Health Administration and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and the §Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
Article Figures & Tables
Figures
In this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
Problems for clinical judgement: 4. Surviving in the report card era
Jack V. Tu, Michael J. Schull, Lorraine E. Ferris, Janet E. Hux, Donald A. Redelmeier
CMAJ Jun 2001, 164 (12) 1709-1712;
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- 1. Don't shoot the messenger
- 2. Check that the results are risk-adjusted
- 3. Check the quality of the data prior to analysis
- 4. Ask if the authors have conflicts of interest
- 5. Know your outcomes before others do
- 6. Complete your charts carefully
- 7. Focus your practice
- 8. Learn from your colleagues
- 9. Ask for the full story of both process and outcomes
- 10. If you can't beat them, join them
- Footnotes
- References
- Figures & Tables
- Responses
- Metrics
Related Articles
- No related articles found.