Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News and analysis

Is a minority government in the offing? Might it be good for health care?

Charlotte Gray
CMAJ October 31, 2000 163 (9) 1180;
Charlotte Gray
Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Politicians watch all opinion polls closely, but they are watching the ones being conducted for this federal election campaign like hawks. The reason is simple: today's polls carry more weight than they did in the last 2 elections because the Liberals finally face some serious competition. “A minority Liberal government is quite possible,” says David Cameron, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto. “The Liberals have not offered voters a powerful reason to keep them in office. They were close to a minority last time, and the likelihood that they can get a better result in their third election than they did in their second, without changing leaders and facing the new Canadian Alliance Party, is low.”

If Jean Chrétien's party doesn't win a bare minimum of 151 seats in the House of Commons, Canada will have its first minority government since Joe Clark's short-lived turn in the sun in 1979. If we do get one in the next few months, it could have a huge impact on issues such as health care because minority governments make for strange bedfellows. Even a small, left-leaning party like the NDP holds enormous potential power if it is called on to prop up the Liberals.

So how would a minority government operate? Federally, minority governments traditionally rely on opportunism. From 1957 to 1979, both Liberal and Tory minority governments — there were 6 of them — recruited allies as they needed them, issue by issue. Each minority government bounced back and forth between the opposition parties, according to which issue they could dangle in front of which potential ally. This is likely the way a Liberal minority government would operate today.

Cameron says it might be forced to generate political energy that is missing from the current government. “If a government is running for its life, it is likely to be more creative in policy terms than the stand-pat, don't-rock-the-boat majority government we have watched for the past few years. It will be acutely sensitive to both voters and potential partners.”

But since the Canadian Alliance will have all the momentum and will be eager to bring down the government, the Liberals will seek support from the NDP, Bloc Québécois or Tories, all of which are now on the left of Chrétien's Liberals.

And why would they prop up the Liberals? “It is worth while for a third party to support a minority government if it can get its platform adopted,” explains Cameron. “None of those parties can hope to form a government themselves, nor would they get in bed with each other. But if they can claim a policy victory and keep the Alliance out of power at the same time, they will resist any pressure to defeat the Liberals.”

Cameron anticipates that the dynamics of a minority government will strengthen the Canada Health Act. “The Alliance is seen as no friend of a publicly funded health care system, and the other 4 parties are committed to preserving medicare.” Since the Liberals have made the preservation of medicare central to their platform, they will enlist NDP, Tory and Bloc support for new health care initiatives. They can then accuse the Alliance of trying to destroy Canada's favourite social program by recommending the erosion of federal authority.

What gives the Liberals the chills right now, though, is the prospect that Stockwell Day, the Alliance leader, might do a better job of building a coalition than Jean Chrétien. Day will be a real threat if he can convince undecided voters in Quebec that he is committed to decentralization and undecided voters in Ontario that the Alliance can grow beyond its Western roots. That's why his success last August in recruiting 2 former Bloc Québécois MPs as Alliance candidates in Quebec prompted an outburst of antiseparatist rhetoric from senior Liberals, who accused the Alliance leader of “sleeping with the enemy.” (The next day the National Post pointed out that the Liberals had been actively wooing a couple of sitting Bloc MPs.)

The Liberals remain well ahead of the Alliance in the polls and, now that Day is in the House of Commons, they are confident that his vaunted “charisma” will not survive the verbal fisticuffs of Question Period.

But they may be wrong. If they are, and the Alliance continues to rise in the polls, Liberal strategists will have to start planning the tactics they will use to ensure the survival of the first federal minority government of the new century. —

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 163, Issue 9
31 Oct 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is a minority government in the offing? Might it be good for health care?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is a minority government in the offing? Might it be good for health care?
Charlotte Gray
CMAJ Oct 2000, 163 (9) 1180;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Is a minority government in the offing? Might it be good for health care?
Charlotte Gray
CMAJ Oct 2000, 163 (9) 1180;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?
  • Gene mutation may explain multiple-birth pregnancies
  • Greening of health care goal of new coalition
Show more News and Analysis

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire