Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

What's in a name?

N. G. Nair, H. Hayden, P. A. Seminiano, P. N. Mistry and R. Raina
CMAJ July 11, 2000 163 (1) 13-14;
N. G. Nair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Hayden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. A. Seminiano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. N. Mistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Raina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We echo Peter Wing's sentiments regarding the use of the word "patient" rather than "client" for people seeking health care.1 The choice of words has perhaps more relevance in psychiatry than in other medical disciplines. Failure to call an ill person a patient may lead to suboptimal management of psychiatric disorders and may deprive the person of some state and insurance benefits. Indeed, the Mental Health Act continues to use the term patient.

Via a self-administered questionnaire, we surveyed the preferences of 402 consecutive people (median age 42 years) who sought outpatient mental health care between October 1997 and January 1998 from 5 psychiatrists in Langley, British Columbia. A similar questionnaire was also administered to 60 physicians (6 psychiatrists, 54 family physicians), 30 nurses, 16 social workers and 13 occupational therapists at Langley Memorial Hospital and Langley Mental Health Centre.

Seventy-two percent of the care seekers (289/402) preferred to be addressed as patients, with 27% preferring the term clients and 1% the term consumers. Older people preferred to be called patients. Ninety-five percent of the physicians preferred to address those for whom they care as patients. In contrast, 57% of the nurses and 15% of the occupational therapists preferred the term patient. None of the social workers wanted to use the term patient; they preferred the term client (75%) or consumer (25%).

There is a clear dichotomy between the preferences of physicians and non-physicians. However, the majority of people seeking mental health care prefer to be addressed as patients, which leads us to believe that there is no reason to deviate from the current medical vocabulary.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    Wing PC. Patient or client? If in doubt, ask. CMAJ 1997;157(3):287-9.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 163, Issue 1
11 Jul 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Newsletter (85-92)

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What's in a name?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What's in a name?
N. G. Nair, H. Hayden, P. A. Seminiano, P. N. Mistry, R. Raina
CMAJ Jul 2000, 163 (1) 13-14;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
What's in a name?
N. G. Nair, H. Hayden, P. A. Seminiano, P. N. Mistry, R. Raina
CMAJ Jul 2000, 163 (1) 13-14;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
  • Observational evidence in support of screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient's perspective
    • Psychiatry & mental health: adult

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire