The diagnosis of ischemic stroke remains a clinical one, with confirmatory evidence obtained through neuroimaging. Early ischemic changes may be subtle or absent on CT scans. Analogous to the role that the creatine kinase (CK) MB fraction or troponin testing plays in the management of acute coronary syndromes, a biochemical test or panel of tests may be useful in the management of acute ischemic stroke.
We designed a preliminary prospective cohort study to test a panel of biochemical markers (neuron-specific enolase [NSE], myelin basic protein [MBP], S-100β protein and thrombomodulin [Tm]) in blood samples from patients with acute ischemic stroke. These markers were chosen because they cover important cellular components of the brain that might be damaged in acute stroke. Adult patients with a persistent neurological deficit due to ischemic stroke were eligible. Twenty-eight nonconsecutive patients admitted at 2 hospitals with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke confirmed by CT scanning were evaluated. Their National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission and their modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on discharge were recorded. All patients provided informed consent. Blood samples were drawn on days 1 (admission), 3, 5 and 7 at one hospital and on days 1, 2 and 3 at the second hospital. Samples were immediately centrifuged and sera stored at −70°C. The 4 biochemical markers were assayed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.1 Normal values were obtained through analysis of blood samples from healthy blood donors; thresholds for elevated levels were defined by the 98th percentile values for each marker. Analysis of the serum levels from healthy subjects showed no relation to age or sex.1
The mean age of the 28 patients was 65 years (range 27-90); 18 were men. Stroke types were classified using the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification:2 partial anterior circulation stroke (PACS) in 10 patients, lacunar stroke (LACS) in 8, posterior circulation stroke (POCS) in 4 and total anterior circulation stroke (TACS) in 1; the type was unknown in 5. The time from stroke onset to initial phlebotomy was not controlled and varied from 3 to 24 hours.
On admission, elevated levels of NSE were found in 89% of the patients, Tm in 43%, MBP in 39% and S-100β in 32%. At least one of the markers was elevated on admission in 93% of the patients (Table 1). By stroke type, 100% of the patients with LACS, 100% of those with POCS and 90% of those with PACS had elevated NSE levels on admission. Conversely, none of the patients with LACS had an elevated S-100β level initially or subsequently. Peak levels of NSE, S-100β and MBP, but not of Tm, were significantly correlated with admission NIHSS scores (p < 0.05). Similarly, peak levels of NSE, S-100β and Tm, but not of MBP, were significantly correlated with discharge mRS scores (p < 0.05).
These preliminary results confirm an important conclusion: brain proteins are released into the blood after stroke, they can be easily measured, and they correlate with outcome. Others have examined these questions with a variety of markers.[3–6] One advantage of using a panel of markers may be improved sensitivity.
Time after stroke onset to initial phlebotomy was not controlled in this preliminary study. Given the recent use of thrombolytic therapy within 3 hours of acute stroke onset,7 biochemical markers will be of most use if they are elevated in the first hours after stroke. In addition, the specificity of the test was arbitrarily fixed by values from a group of healthy blood donors. Thresholds for test interpretation may differ in a population of patients with non-neurological acute illnesses.
Several new hypotheses deserve further testing. Use of the panel of markers may make it possible to identify stroke subtypes biochemically. Although we did not show it in this small sample, a panel of biochemical markers may have greater diagnostic utility than any single marker alone. We are proceeding to address these questions at defined times in the first hours after stroke onset.
Competing interests: None declared for Dr. Bayer or Ms. Lawrence; Dr. Hill received travel assistance from Skye Pharmatech Inc. to present these data at an international stroke meeting; Dr. Jackowski is the scientific director at Skye Pharmatech Inc. and owns stock in the company; and Dr. Jaeschke was a one-time paid consultant for Skye Pharmatech Inc.
Acknowledgments
"I learned about epidemiology, stastistics, scientific and copy editing, the whole world of medical journalism, right on the job. It was a special year, a year about meeting mentors and finding focus."
-Dr. Caralee Caplan, 1998 Fellow
"It provides a unique opportunity to sharpen research and writing skills and to establish relationships with physicians across the country. It lets you build a platform for issues and perspectives pertinent to new physicians and physicians in training."
-Dr. Erica Weir, 1999 Fellow
Footnotes
-
This article has been peer reviewed.
Reprint requests to: Dr. Michael D. Hill, Rm. MRG005, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403-29th St. NW, Calgary AB T2N 2T9; fax 403 270-7907; [email protected]