Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society

Sylvia R. Cruess and Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ March 07, 2000 162 (5) 668-669;
Sylvia R. Cruess
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Cruess
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The past decades have been characterized by an increasingly diverse society that has questioned both traditional values and societal structures. All professions, including medicine, have seen their stature diminish, and because of the increasing intrusion of government and the private sector into health care, medicine has lost both autonomy and influence throughout the world1 and in Canada.2 These changes have led to a recognition that medicine needs to re-examine its role so that it may best serve both individual patients and society. During recent medical history, there have been periods of introspection and discussion, but the dialogue has generally been among physicians, or between society and licensing bodies or medical associations. There has also been a dialogue among social scientists studying medicine, and between them and society. Unfortunately, there has been little communication between physicians and social scientists, 2 groups that share many interests, including the welfare of society. To understand better its role and values, medicine must listen to those who have studied and considered the professions, in particular the medical profession. This is why it is so satisfying to see the article by William Sullivan, a sociologist and philosopher, published in CMAJ (see page 673).3

There has always been a strong link between medicine's traditional values and the concept of professionalism. Physicians fill the role of healer and professional simultaneously,4,5 roles that have different origins and traditions. The healer, which is what individual citizens and society require, comes to Western culture from the Hippocratic tradition. The role is reasonably well understood and has had an important place in the medical curriculum for a long time. Professionalism, on the other hand, arose in the guilds and universities of the Middle Ages1 but had little impact on society until modern scientific medicine developed. As the delivery of health care became increasingly complex, Western society chose to use the concept of the profession as a means of organizing the delivery of health services. The professions were granted a considerable degree of autonomy in the Anglo-American world. As industrialized societies became wealthier, the professions were granted status, prestige and substantial rewards on the assumption that professionals would be altruistic and moral in their day-to-day activities. This formed the basis of the social contract between medicine and society, and functioned relatively well as long as both the profession and society were reasonably homogeneous and shared many values. In those simpler times professionalism was transmitted by respected role models to both students and the wider community.

The concept of professionalism came under intense scrutiny during the 1960s and 1970s. The belief that physicians would be altruistic was greeted with scepticism by social scientists, and medicine was accused of putting its own welfare above that of society.1,6 This occurred as the government or the private sector took control of the medical marketplace throughout the world.1 The intellectual basis for the criticism was articulated largely in the sociology literature, not readily available to physicians. The impact of this work on public policy was substantial. Medicine's response was defensive, which gave some further credence to the criticism itself.

Since the late 1980s, there has been a change in the opinion of the social scientists, with most commentators now being supportive of the concept of professionalism.3,7 Part of medicine's problem stemmed from the fact that it had been blamed for defects in the health care system. With the diminishing influence of the profession on public policy, the blame has shifted to those primarily responsible - the government or the private sector - and professionalism as a concept appears to be respectable once more.

There appears to be a window of opportunity8 to redefine medicine's contract with society. This window exists because of public dissatisfaction with the way nonphysician managers, either in government (in Canada) or in the private sector (in the US), are managing health care. The public is asking for a return of medical professionalism, with its core values of scientific expertise and altruism. However, this must be a professionalism that meets contemporary requirements and is understood by both the medical profession and society, because many of society's expectations depend on medicine meeting the obligations that are drawn from the traditions of the professional. This is why a knowledge of work by Sullivan and other social scientists is so important to Canadian physicians.

Sullivan's concept of "civic professionalism" offers medicine a future in which the values we cherish are central. In addition, the objectives that he proposes, including commitment to service, are achievable. We will be able to look ahead with some confidence, rather than with the pessimism that is so often articulated. He has much to teach us, and we have much to learn.

The authors are with the Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal.

Competing interests: None declared.

Footnotes

  • See related article page 673

    Correspondence to: Dr. Sylvia R. Cruess, Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, 1110 Pine Ave. W, Montreal QC H3A 1A3; fax 514 398-7246; rcruess{at}medcor.mcgill.ca

References

  1. 1.↵
    Krause EA. Death of the guilds: professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 1996.
  2. 2.↵
    Coburn D. Professional powers in decline: medicine in Canada. In: Hafferty FW, McKinlay JB, editors. The changing medical profession. An international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 92-104.
  3. 3.↵
    Sullivan WM. Medicine under threat: professionalism and professional identity. CMAJ 2000;162(5):673-5. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-162/issue-5/0673.htm
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Cruess R, Cruess S. Teaching medicine as a profession in the service of healing. Acad Med 1997;72:941-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.
    Cruess S, Cruess R. Teaching professionalism. BMJ 1997;314:1674-7.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.
    Freidson E. Professional dominance: the social structure of medical care. Chicago: Aldine; 1970.
  7. 7.
    Freidson E. Professionalism reborn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
  8. 8.↵
    Cruess R, Cruess S, Johnston S. Renewing professionalism: an opportunity for medicine. Acad Med 1999;74:878-84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 162, Issue 5
7 Mar 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society
Sylvia R. Cruess, Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ Mar 2000, 162 (5) 668-669;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Professionalism: a contract between medicine and society
Sylvia R. Cruess, Richard L. Cruess
CMAJ Mar 2000, 162 (5) 668-669;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessing leadership in junior resident physicians: using a new multisource feedback tool to measure Learning by Evaluation from All-inclusive 360 Degree Engagement of Residents (LEADER)
  • How Should Board Certification Evolve?
  • Maintenance of Certification and the Challenge of Professionalism
  • Medical professionalism: what does the public think?
  • The ethical professional as endangered person: blog notes on doctor-patient relationships
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
  • Preventing the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into school settings
  • How should we move for health? The case for the 24-hour movement paradigm
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Professional conduct & regulation
    • Patient education
    • Medical humanities

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire