Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
CMAJ Specialty Spotlight: Interventional Neuroradiology

Detachable coils to treat intracranial aneurysms

Robert A. Willinsky
CMAJ November 02, 1999 161 (9) 1136;
Robert A. Willinsky
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Technology: Guglielmi detachable coil for intracranial aneurysms

Use: With an annual incidence of 10-12 cases per 100 000, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a major cause of death or disability.1 Over 30% of patients die within 24 hours of a hemorrhage, and if not treated a further 25-30% will succumb within 4 weeks from rebleeding, vasospasm or hydrocephalus.2 In an international study on the timing of aneurysm surgery 58% of patients presenting with aneurysms exhibited a complete recovery, 16% were disabled and 26% died.3 FIGURE

Figure

Figure. Schematic diagram of a microcatheter and GDC within an aneurysm.

The Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC; Target Therapeutics [Boston Scientific], Fremont Calif.) is a soft platinum helical coil that is soldered to a stainless steel delivery guidewire. It can be deposited through a microcatheter into an intracranial aneurysm where it promotes thrombosis and thus prevents rebleeding. Unlike previous coils, the GDC can be repositioned if necessary or detached with the passage of an electric current. The GDC has typically been used in patients where aneurysms are difficult to approach surgically or in older patients who are either of poor grade or have concurrent medical problems.

History: Dr. Guido Gulielmi developed the GDC in 1989 as an alternative to surgery. Its efficacy was demonstrated first in the animal laboratory and then in clinical trials.4 The favourable outcomes in a multicentre trial following its use in 403 patients with intracranial aneurysms who were considered high risk for surgery5 led to Food and Drug Association approval in the United States in 1995 and Health Protection Branch approval in Canada in 1996. Worldwide, approximately 12 000 patients were treated with GDC in 1998 (unpublished data, Target Therapeutics).

Promise: Endovascular treatment with GDC is less invasive than surgery because brain retraction and cranial nerve manipulation are avoided. Rebleeding is rare (< 1% per year), and procedural complication rates range from 2% to 6%.[5, 6] Complete occlusion of the aneurysm can be achieved in 70%-80% of small- and medium-sized aneurysms with a relatively small neck.[5, 7]

Problems: Not all aneurysms are suitable for GDC, however. Significant coil compaction has been noted in giant aneurysms or large aneurysms containing clot, and many wide-neck aneurysms cannot be treated because the coil will not be retained. The long-term efficacy of incompletely occluded aneurysms is unknown.

Prospects: Technical advances will continue to improve the safety and efficacy of GDCs to treat cerebral aneurysms. Devices to ensure optimal placement of the coils are under development, new softer coils expedite tighter packing of the aneurysm, and biplane angiography with 3-dimensional reconstruction will allow for optimal treatment planning.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Wiebers DO, Torner JC, Meissner I. Impact of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on public health in the United States. Stroke 1992;23:1416-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Schievink WI. Intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1997;336:28-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL. The International Cooperative Study on Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management. J Neurosurg 1990;73:18-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 1991;75:8-14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Vinuela F, Duclweiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;86:475-82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ, Algra A. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 1999;30:470-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J. Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology 1998;206:499-510.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 161, Issue 9
2 Nov 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detachable coils to treat intracranial aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Detachable coils to treat intracranial aneurysms
Robert A. Willinsky
CMAJ Nov 1999, 161 (9) 1136;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Detachable coils to treat intracranial aneurysms
Robert A. Willinsky
CMAJ Nov 1999, 161 (9) 1136;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Neurology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire