Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorials

CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation

K. S. Joseph and John Hoey
CMAJ October 19, 1999 161 (8) 977-978;
K. S. Joseph
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Hoey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The creation of citation indexes brought symmetry to the study of scientific developments. Whereas the reference lists appended to published articles allow scientific advances to be tracked backward to their earlier conceptual origins, a citation index allows one to follow the career of scientific papers forward to establish their role in subsequent progress. The indexing of citations therefore permits sociologists and historians to see how "the cloth of science is woven."1

Citations are deemed the currency of science. Citation indexes are used to assess scientific impact,[2, 3] and algorithms based on citation data can corroborate and even forecast Nobel prize awards.4 Citation indexes are also used to determine the "impact factor" and related indicators of the performance of scientific journals within their particular fields.3 This editorial briefly details CMAJ's recent performance in relation to top-performing journals of general and internal medicine and anticipates changes in the near future. In another article in this issue5 (page 979) Eugene Garfield, Chairman emeritus of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) in Philadelphia, comments on the uses and abuses of citation data and indices.

A journal's impact factor expresses the relation between the volume of substantive scientific articles that it publishes and the frequency with which the journal is cited. For example, according to the ISI's Journal Citation Reports,6 CMAJ published a total of 350 substantive papers in 1995 and 1996. These represent the denominator of the ratio used to determine our impact factor. In 1997, 556 citations were made in the medical literature to items that had been published in CMAJ during 1995 and 1996. CMAJ's impact factor for 1997 was therefore 1.6. This compares with impact factors ranging from 5.0 to 27.8 for the 6 top-ranking journals in general and internal medicine (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1: Performance indicators for selected journals of general and internal medicine, as reported in Journal Citation Reports

Numerators and denominators used to calculate impact factor vary widely from journal to journal, sometimes with interesting effect. For example, the impact-factor ranking of the Journal of Investigative Medicine ahead of the BMJ appears incongruous given the respective publication volumes of these journals. An alternative measure of impact, namely absolute citation counts3 (i.e., the number of citations in the current year to items in the journal published in any previous year) shows the BMJ to be well ahead not only of the Journal of Investigative Medicine but also of the Annals of Internal Medicine (Table 1). CMAJ received a total of 4129 citations in 1997. Admittedly, absolute citation counts tend to favour older journals and those that publish more papers.3

According to Journal Citation Reports the number of substantive scientific items (i.e., "source" items counted in the impact-factor denominator) published annually by the Lancet and by CMAJ almost doubled from 1996 to 1997 (Table 1). The change in the number of source items reported for the Lancet appears to be related mainly to the introduction of a Research Letters section in 1997. As these are short reports they are less likely to be cited, and thus we may, unfortunately, predict a decline in the Lancet's impact factor.

We were curious about the increase in the number of source items reported by Journal Citation Reports for CMAJ. Journal Citation Reports defines substantive articles as original research articles and review articles. Excluded are letters to the editor, editorials, book reviews, news items and the like. Hand-counting the number of substantive scientific papers published in 1997, we arrived at only 175, not the 303 reported by Journal Citation Reports (Table 1). Similarly, reviewing all issues of CMAJ in 1995 and 1996, we could identify only 176 articles that reported original research or were program descriptions or review articles. Using this number as our denominator, we arrived at an impact factor of 3.2. Because of the difficulty of classifying some items (such as a long letter on ethics, for example, or a supplement that included 9 different subsections) the denominator may have been as high as 208, giving an impact factor of 2.7. But CMAJ certainly did not publish 350 scientific papers and reviews in 1995 and 1996. According to our calculations, the number of substantive scientific articles published did rise markedly, from 97 in 1995 and 111 in 1996 to 175 in 1997. This reflects our efforts to increase the clinical relevance of the journal.7 However, there was an error in the tally reported by Journal Citation Reports.

Subsequent discussions with Janet Robertson, editor of Journal Citation Reports, revealed that the denominator used to calculate CMAJ's impact factor was inflated by the inclusion of reports in our News and Features section as research papers or clinical review articles (Janet Robertson, ISI, Philadelphia, Pa: personal communication, 1999). This problem will be corrected beginning in the current year, so that the CMAJ impact factor as published in 2001 will not need to be recalculated.

There are instances in various types of journals where the presentation of different article types makes accurate classification difficult for the ISI. The Institute attempts to count only the truly scientific papers and review articles and welcomes advice from editors on how to do this for their particular journal.

So what does an impact factor of 3.2, 2.7, or whatever the case may be, really mean? It means that we need to do better and to keep trying to get better papers. CMAJ is well behind other major journals internationally, and many Canadian authors continue to send papers to foreign journals for publication. By correcting our impact factor we hope to attract some of these authors to our pages and in so doing make the journal more informative, relevant and interesting for readers.

Footnotes

  • SYMBOL See related articles pages 979 and 985

    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Symbol. No caption available.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Garfield E. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 1970;227:669-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955;122:108-11.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Garfield E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996;313:411-3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. Of Nobel class: a citation perspective on high impact research authors. Theor Med 1992;13:117-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 1999;161(8):979-80.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Journal Citation Reports 1997. Science Citation Index, Institute for Scientific Information. Philadelphia: 1998.
  7. 7.↵
    Joseph KS, Hoey J. Research letters in CMAJ [editorial]. CMAJ 1999;160 (6):825.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 161, Issue 8
19 Oct 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Special Supplement: Cardiovascular Disease in Seniors

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation
K. S. Joseph, John Hoey
CMAJ Oct 1999, 161 (8) 977-978;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation
K. S. Joseph, John Hoey
CMAJ Oct 1999, 161 (8) 977-978;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The impact factor of seven orthopaedic journals: FACTORS INFLUENCING IT
  • Quality of impact factors of general medical journals
  • The Impact of Impact Factors
  • Impact of abstracts and short reports
  • Impact of abstracts and short reports
  • When editors publish in their own journals
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to put the Canadian Institutes of Health Research on trial
  • When editors publish in their own journals
  • New reproductive technologies: Why are we limiting choices for infertile couples?
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • CMAJ editorial policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire