Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Really Original Research

Bubble bubble, abdominal trouble: a new test to chew on

Graham Worrall, Peggy Holmes and Megan Robbins
CMAJ December 14, 1999 161 (12) 1520-1521;
Graham Worrall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peggy Holmes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Robbins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Appendicitis, acute pancreatitis, diverticulitus: all possible serious diagnoses in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain. The diagnosis of these and other generalized or localized irritations of the peritoneum is sometimes based on the physician's "gut feelings" but are more commonly the result of diagnostic tests. A number of such tests have been proposed to exclude peritonitis or any serious acute abdominal pathology.[1–3] At best, these tests have been found to have only modest sensitivity and specificity, and their positive predictive value in the relatively low-prevalence situation of primary care is likely to be poor. In the acute stage, x-rays, urinalysis and blood tests are well known to give mostly negative results.

With no reliable diagnostic tool available, we must turn to trailblazers like Wriggley and H. Bubba. We present the results from a pilot study of a new test for the assessment of acute abdominal pain: the 3C-BG (chew, chomp, crack, bubble-blow gum) test.

The 3C-BG test

Results are deemed positive if any of the following activities are observed during the examination.

  • Continued closed-mouth gum chewing throughout the examination (+) (Fig. 1).

  • Open-mouth gum chomping (++).

  • Gum cracking, in addition to chewing (+++).

  • Bubble blowing (++++) (Fig. 2).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 1: Subject with (+) positive 3C-BG test result.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Fig. 2: Subject with (++++) positive 3C-BG test result.

The presence of a positive result means that the patient does not have a serious illness.

Pilot study

Six consecutive patients who presented with abdominal pain to our small emergency department in rural Newfoundland, and who were observed by the admitting nurse to be chewing bubble gum, agreed to participate. Two subjects were later excluded: one because, on closer inspection, he was discovered to be chewing tobacco and another because he was clicking his false teeth and did not actually have gum in his mouth. All eligible participants were subjected to routine history-taking and physical examination; laboratory tests and x-rays were ordered as the attending physician (G.W.) felt appropriate. During the history-taking, examination and laboratory testing, all patients were kept under observation, except when they were in the washroom (that's a different study altogether).

Of the 4 people eligible for the 3C-BG test, 2 were females and 2 were males. Their ages ranged from 6 to 36 years. All had great breath. We observed 1 chomper, 1 cracker and 2 bubble-blowers. None proved to have a serious abdominal illness. All complained that their bubble gum had lost its flavour.

If the 3C-BG test results were positive and the physical examination and laboratory tests gave negative results, the patients were reassured that a serious illness was unlikely. They were given symptomatic relief (and referral to a good dentist) and allowed to go home. All were informed that they should return if their abdominal pain did not settle or if they swallowed the gum, because the substance can "stick your insides together."4

Interpretation

We found that the 3C-BG test is a useful tool in determining whether a serious abdominal illness is present. In light of the evident use of bubble gum in providing a cheap and efficient diagnostic test for physicians, is there any evidence that it might cause harm? Gum base contains calcium carbonate, and it has been found to simulate abdominal calcifications when subjected to CT scan.5 One case of bubble-gum chewing causing an abdominal bezoar has been reported in the literature.6 When the gum being chewed contains the roots of the herb Atractylis gummifera, intoxication and severe hepatocellular lysis have been reported,7 but the chewing of commercial bubble gum has not had these effects. The only reported cases of gum-related toxicity concern the use of nicotine gum, which can cause agitation, lethargy, hypotension, abdominal pain and vomiting in small children within 30 minutes of ingestion.8 Other cases of near suffocation by large bubble bursts have also been reported.9

On the other hand, there is evidence that bubble gum can benefit those who use it. In Finland, the use of xylitol gum was associated with better dental health.10 Other studies have shown that patients with reflux can get relief from heartburn by chewing gum.11 Some claim that chewing gum is beneficial for mental health.12 Furthermore, gum chewing helps one to kiss longer, to decrease the unbearably high temperatures in one's mouth and to perform at Olympic gold medal standards in various sports.13

We have not proposed any hypotheses regarding the relation between the 4 positive levels of the 3C-BG test and complaints of abdominal pain. It was noted, however, that the subject found to be a gum chomper rated his pain a "6," whereas the person who cracked her bubble gum rated hers a "3." Perhaps there is a correlation between level of pain and type of gum chewer. Also, we cannot determine the causality of the relation between gum chewing and abdominal illness. Perhaps the act of chewing bubble gum cures serious abdominal illness? Could it also be that healthy people are more prone to chew bubble gum? Perhaps bubble-gum chewing causes the nonserious abdominal pain. Further study of bubble gum, including flavours, consistencies, brand names and length of chewing time, is required.

In conclusion, given the high proportion of patients who are chewing bubble gum when they present to emergency departments, we recommend more widespread use of the 3C-BG test. At the very least, with their mouths full of bubble gum, patients will be less able to complain about their abdominal pain. Extra effort must be made to introduce this test in the emergency department and keep it off the streets (and the soles of our shoes).

Competing interests: The authors have been known to chew bubble gum and to blow bubbles for the fun of it. They did not receive any funding for their study from companies that manufacture chewing gum.

Acknowledgments

Use the CMAJ Classified pages to reach 60 000 physicians with your message

Call 800 663-7336 or 613 731-9331 ×2127/2314

References

  1. 1.↵
    Prout WG. The significance of rebound tenderness in the acute abdomen. Br J Surg 1970;57:508-10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    Liddington MI, Thompson WHF. Rebound tenderness test. Br J Surg 1991;71:795-6.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Bennett DH, Tambeur L, Campbell WB. Use of coughing test to diagnose peritonitis. BMJ 1994;306:1336.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Mom.
  5. 5.↵
    Geller E, Smergel EM. Bubble gum simulating abdominal calcifications. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:298-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Truex JH, Silberman TL, Wood BP. Radiological case of the month. Bubble gum bezoar. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:253-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Larrey D. Liver involvement in the course of phytotherapy [editorial]. Presse Med 1994;23:691-3.
  8. 8.↵
    Smolinske SC, Spoerke DG, Spiller SK, Wruk KM, Kulig K, Rumack BH. Cigarette and nicotine chewing gum toxicity in children. Hum Toxicol 1998;7:27-31.
  9. 9.↵
    Holmes P. I came, I chewed, I blew. Autobiography of a gum chewer. [Manuscript submitted for publication.]
  10. 10.↵
    Honkala E, Rimpela A, Karvonen S, Rimpela M. Chewing of xylitol gum - a well adopted practice among Finnish adolescents. Caries Res 1996;30:34-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Consult stat. Reflux patients get heartburn relief from chewing gum. RN 1996;59:61.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Chompalot I. I chew, therefore I am. Philosophical meditations of a masticator. J Phil Mast 1902;2:79-81.
  13. 13.↵
    Don't you watch those television gum commercials?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 161, Issue 12
14 Dec 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bubble bubble, abdominal trouble: a new test to chew on
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bubble bubble, abdominal trouble: a new test to chew on
Graham Worrall, Peggy Holmes, Megan Robbins
CMAJ Dec 1999, 161 (12) 1520-1521;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Bubble bubble, abdominal trouble: a new test to chew on
Graham Worrall, Peggy Holmes, Megan Robbins
CMAJ Dec 1999, 161 (12) 1520-1521;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The 3C-BG test
    • Pilot study
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A "take with a grain of salt" label for Holiday Review articles
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Is chicken soup an essential drug?
  • Fetal sex determination: the predictive value of 3 common myths
Show more Really Original Research

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire