Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Review * Synthèse

Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope -- if we can just get all the players onside

J. Frank, S. Sinclair, S. Hogg-Johnson, H. Shannon, C. Bombardier, D. Beaton and D. Cole
CMAJ June 16, 1998 158 (12) 1625-1631;
J. Frank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Sinclair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Hogg-Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Shannon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Bombardier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Beaton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Cole
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite the publication in the mid-1990s of comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of acute low-back pain, both in the United States and elsewhere, this ubiquitous health problem continues to be the main cause of workers' compensation claims in much of the Western world. This paper represents a synthesis of the intervention studies published in the last 4 years and is based on a new approach to categorizing these studies that emphasizes the stage or phase of back pain at the time of intervention and the site or agent of the intervention. Current thinking suggests that medical management in the first 3-4 weeks after the onset of pain should be generally conservative. Several studies of rather heterogeneous interventions focusing on return to work and implemented in the subacute stage (3-4 to 12 weeks after the onset of pain) have shown important reductions in time lost from work (by 30% to 50%). There is substantial evidence indicating that employers who promptly offer appropriately modified duties can reduce time lost per episode of back pain by at least 30%, with frequent spin-off effects on the incidence of new back-pain claims as well. Finally, newer studies of guidelines-based approaches to back pain in the workplace suggest that a combination of all these approaches, in a coordinated workplace-linked care system, can achieve a reduction of 50% in time lost due to back pain, at no extra cost and, in some settings, with significant savings.

  • Copyright © 1998 by Canadian Medical Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 158, Issue 12
16 Jun 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope -- if we can just get all the players onside
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope -- if we can just get all the players onside
J. Frank, S. Sinclair, S. Hogg-Johnson, H. Shannon, C. Bombardier, D. Beaton, D. Cole
CMAJ Jun 1998, 158 (12) 1625-1631;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope -- if we can just get all the players onside
J. Frank, S. Sinclair, S. Hogg-Johnson, H. Shannon, C. Bombardier, D. Beaton, D. Cole
CMAJ Jun 1998, 158 (12) 1625-1631;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Does enhanced information exchange between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians improve patient work resumption? A controlled intervention study
  • Prognosis in Soft Tissue Disorders of the Shoulder: Predicting Both Change in Disability and Level of Disability After Treatment
  • Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison
  • Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries
  • Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study
  • Identifying Psychosocial Variables in Patients With Acute Work-Related Low Back Pain: The Importance of Fear-Avoidance Beliefs
  • Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes -- a prospective study
  • Neck pain
  • Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain
  • The silent payer speaks: workers' compensation boards and Canadian physicians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Two tick-borne diseases in one: a case report of concurrent babesiosis and Lyme disease in Ontario
  • Tuberculosis: 7. Laboratory aspects of diagnosis
  • A physician-centered intervention to shorten hospital stay: a pilot study
Show more Review * Synthèse

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire