Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Journal Article

Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria

W. A. Ghali, A. Palepu and W. G. Paterson
CMAJ May 01, 1994 150 (9) 1449-1454;
W. A. Ghali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Palepu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. G. Paterson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess current red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices and to determine the potential impact of implementing recently published guidelines on RBC transfusion from the American College of Physicians (ACP). DESIGN: Medical chart review. SETTING: A 219-bed teaching hospital in Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: All patients over 12 years of age who received RBC transfusions in March 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for transfusion according to the ACP guidelines and the number of blood units ordered for each transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients received 170 RBC units. According to the ACP guidelines 94 (55.3%) of the units were judged unnecessary. The departments of Surgery and Internal Medicine did not differ significantly in the number of unnecessary units (56.4% v. 52.8%). Among the surgical subspecialties, unnecessary transfusion was most common in the orthopedics service (73.5%, p < 0.05). Blood was most frequently ordered 2 units at a time (51.8% of units). Transfusion in normovolemic, hemodynamically stable patients with anemia and unnecessary multiple-unit transfusions were the most common violations of the ACP guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: According to the ACP guidelines, there was significant unnecessary blood use in the hospital surveyed. The guidelines provide a useful framework for assessing transfusion practices but may require further refinement to apply to a broader spectrum of clinical settings.

  • Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Medical Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 150, Issue 9
1 May 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria
W. A. Ghali, A. Palepu, W. G. Paterson
CMAJ May 1994, 150 (9) 1449-1454;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion practices with the use of preset criteria
W. A. Ghali, A. Palepu, W. G. Paterson
CMAJ May 1994, 150 (9) 1449-1454;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Endorsing single-unit transfusion combined with a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold after knee arthroplasty
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PEI's fixed link to mainland a living laboratory for occupational medicine
  • Impact on health care adds to the social cost of homelessness, MDs say
  • Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning
Show more Journal Article

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire