Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Journal Article

Impact of a formulary on personal care homes in Manitoba

M. R. Yakabowich, G. Keeley and P. R. Montgomery
CMAJ May 15, 1994 150 (10) 1601-1607;
M. R. Yakabowich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Keeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. R. Montgomery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Responses
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a formulary on drug expenditures and prescribing trends in personal care homes (nursing homes). DESIGN: Quasi-experimental analysis of a drug prescription database before and after implementation of the formulary. SETTING: Personal care homes in Manitoba. PATIENTS: Residents occupying the 6848 beds of the 88 personal care homes that did not already have a formulary. INTERVENTION: Formulary, introduced Apr. 1, 1987. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug expenditures from Apr. 1, 1985, to Mar. 31, 1990; proportion of residents receiving a prescription by drug class and rate of prescriptions of nonformulary drugs in the year before and 2 years after the formulary was introduced. MAIN RESULTS: The total drug expenditures per bed remained constant during the first year after the formulary was implemented, even though the annual drug inflation rate was 9.8% on average during the study period. Expenditures 2 and 3 years after implementation rose by 9.4% and 5.8% respectively. Those for specific agents and drug classes targeted as being inappropriate for long-term care decreased greatly because of reduced prescribing. Expenditures for some other drug classes increased mainly because newer, more expensive agents were used. The mean drug expenditure per bed varied widely between homes; neither size nor location were found to correlate with drug expenditure, but adherence to the formulary did predict personal care homes with decreased expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: A formulary in personal care homes can improve therapeutic management. The impact on cost containment was not as strong after the first year, although expenditures remained less than the rate of inflation for drug costs.

  • Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Medical Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 150, Issue 10
15 May 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of a formulary on personal care homes in Manitoba
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of a formulary on personal care homes in Manitoba
M. R. Yakabowich, G. Keeley, P. R. Montgomery
CMAJ May 1994, 150 (10) 1601-1607;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Impact of a formulary on personal care homes in Manitoba
M. R. Yakabowich, G. Keeley, P. R. Montgomery
CMAJ May 1994, 150 (10) 1601-1607;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of a provisional essential medicines list for children in Canada: consensus process
  • Protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of providing essential medicines at no charge: the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medicines (CLEAN Meds) trial
  • Liste canadienne des medicaments essentiels: Potentiel et incertitudes
  • Canadian list of essential medications: Potential and uncertainties
  • Development of a preliminary essential medicines list for Canada
  • Estimated effects of adding universal public coverage of an essential medicines list to existing public drug plans in Canada
  • Physicians' liability and drug formulary restrictions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PEI's fixed link to mainland a living laboratory for occupational medicine
  • Impact on health care adds to the social cost of homelessness, MDs say
  • Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning
Show more Journal Article

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire