Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Clinical Trial

A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies

G. H. Guyatt, P. X. Tugwell, D. H. Feeny, R. B. Haynes and M. Drummond
CMAJ March 15, 1986 134 (6) 587-594;
G. H. Guyatt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. X. Tugwell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. H. Feeny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. B. Haynes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Drummond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Most new diagnostic technologies have not been adequately assessed to determine whether their application improves health. Comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic technologies includes establishing technologic capability and determining the range of possible uses, diagnostic accuracy, impact on the health care provider, therapeutic impact and impact on patient outcome. Guidelines to determine whether each of these criteria have been met adequately are presented. Diagnostic technologies should be disseminated only if they are less expensive, produce fewer untoward effects and are at least as accurate as existing methods, if they eliminate the need for other investigations without loss of accuracy, or if they lead to institution of effective therapy. Establishing patient benefit often requires a randomized controlled trial in which patients receive the new test or an alternative diagnostic strategy. Other study designs are logistically less difficult but may not provide accurate assessment of benefit. Rigorous assessment of diagnostic technologies is needed for efficient use of health care resources.

  • Copyright © 1986 by Canadian Medical Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 134, Issue 6
15 Mar 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies
G. H. Guyatt, P. X. Tugwell, D. H. Feeny, R. B. Haynes, M. Drummond
CMAJ Mar 1986, 134 (6) 587-594;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies
G. H. Guyatt, P. X. Tugwell, D. H. Feeny, R. B. Haynes, M. Drummond
CMAJ Mar 1986, 134 (6) 587-594;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Managing waiting times in diagnostic medical imaging
  • Are Reporting Standards of Diagnostic Test Evaluation Unrealistic?
  • Improving Imaging: Our Professional Imperative
  • Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways
  • Traditional Versus Up-Front [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Staging of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Dutch Cooperative Randomized Study
  • Rapid Tests for Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Laboring Women: A Systematic Review
  • ACCF Proposed Method for Evaluating the Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Evidence-Based Guidelines in Laboratory Medicine: Principles and Methods
  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
  • The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
  • Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
  • Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
  • ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial (the PROSPECT study). PROscar Safety Plus Efficacy Canadian Two year Study
  • Canadian atrial fibrillation anticoagulation study: were the patients subsequently treated with warfarin? Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation Study Group
  • Factors determining compliance with screening mammography
Show more Clinical Trial

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire