Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Background: The reporting of outcomes within published randomized trials has previously
been shown to be incomplete, biased and inconsistent with study protocols. We sought to …
been shown to be incomplete, biased and inconsistent with study protocols. We sought to …
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
ContextSelective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or
direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is …
direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is …
[HTML][HTML] Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
Background The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
[HTML][HTML] Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias—an updated review
K Dwan, C Gamble, PR Williamson, JJ Kirkham… - PloS one, 2013 - journals.plos.org
Background The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a …
Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes
I Boutron, S Dutton, P Ravaud, DG Altman - Jama, 2010 - jamanetwork.com
Context Previous studies indicate that the interpretation of trial results can be distorted by
authors of published reports. Objective To identify the nature and frequency of distorted …
authors of published reports. Objective To identify the nature and frequency of distorted …
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
Objective To examine the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a broad cohort of
published randomised trials. Design Retrospective review of publications and follow up …
published randomised trials. Design Retrospective review of publications and follow up …
Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality
ContextThe evaluation of the methodologic quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is
central to evidence-based health care. Important methodologic detail may, however, be …
central to evidence-based health care. Important methodologic detail may, however, be …
Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond
An extensive and growing number of reviews of the published literature demonstrate that
health research publications have frequent deficiencies. Of particular concern are poor …
health research publications have frequent deficiencies. Of particular concern are poor …
[HTML][HTML] Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
CW Jones, LG Keil, WC Holland, MC Caughey… - BMC medicine, 2015 - Springer
Background Clinical trial registries can improve the validity of trial results by facilitating
comparisons between prospectively planned and reported outcomes. Previous reports on …
comparisons between prospectively planned and reported outcomes. Previous reports on …
[HTML][HTML] Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study
TJ Clifford, NJ Barrowman, D Moher - BMC health services research, 2002 - Springer
Background There has been increasing concern regarding the potential effects of the
commercialization of research. Methods In order to examine the relationships between …
commercialization of research. Methods In order to examine the relationships between …
