A paradigm for multidisciplinary disaster research: the Oklahoma City experience

J Emerg Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;16(4):621-30. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00042-0.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to describe the creation and operation of a multidisciplinary group to examine the Oklahoma City (OKC) bombing. The OKC bombing presented an opportunity to study a major disaster within 2 days of the incident. The Disaster Health Studies Group (DHSG) was created to facilitate this effort. The creation, organization, and operation of the DHSG is outlined. In addition the mission statement, participants, communications, political empowerment, data preservation and collection, data ownership, patient rights, threats to the DHSG, media interactions, funding, the institutional review board process, and results reporting will be detailed. The 22 projects of the DHSG are listed. In conclusion, four main findings are examined: 1) A multidisciplinary disaster study group is feasible and can be rapidly organized; 2) certain organizations and institutions form a core group for facilitation of the research effort; 3) specific issues must be addressed in order for the group to succeed; and 4) the group leader should have disaster expertise and be committed to the multidisciplinary process.

MeSH terms

  • Communication
  • Confidentiality
  • Data Collection
  • Databases as Topic
  • Disasters*
  • Explosions
  • Financing, Government
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Models, Organizational
  • Oklahoma
  • Private Sector
  • Research* / economics