Comparison of community health worker-led diabetes medication decision-making support for low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e-health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 18;161(10 Suppl):S13-22. doi: 10.7326/M13-3012.

Abstract

Background: Health care centers serving low-income communities have scarce resources to support medication decision making among patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

Objective: To compare outcomes between community health worker use of a tailored, interactive, Web-based, tablet computer-delivered tool (iDecide) and use of print educational materials.

Design: Randomized, 2-group trial conducted from 2011 to 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01427660).

Setting: Community health center in Detroit, Michigan, serving a Latino and African American low-income population.

Participants: 188 adults with a hemoglobin A1c value greater than 7.5% (55%) or those who reported questions, concerns, or difficulty taking diabetes medications.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 1- to 2-hour session with a community health worker who used iDecide or printed educational materials and 2 follow-up calls.

Measurements: Primary outcomes were changes in knowledge about antihyperglycemic medications, patient-reported medication decisional conflict, and satisfaction with antihyperglycemic medication information. Also examined were changes in diabetes distress, self-efficacy, medication adherence, and hemoglobin A1c values.

Results: Ninety-four percent of participants completed 3-month follow-up. Both groups improved across most measures. iDecide participants reported greater improvements in satisfaction with medication information (helpfulness, P = 0.007; clarity, P = 0.03) and in diabetes distress compared with the print materials group (P < 0.001). The other outcomes did not differ between the groups.

Limitations: The study was conducted at 1 health center during a short period. The community health workers were experienced in behavioral counseling, thereby possibly mitigating the need for additional support tools.

Conclusion: Most outcomes were similarly improved among participants receiving both types of decision-making support for diabetes medication. Longer-term evaluations are necessary to determine whether the greater improvements in satisfaction with medication information and diabetes distress achieved in the iDecide group at 3 months translate into better longer-term diabetes outcomes.

Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Black or African American / psychology*
  • Community Health Workers*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / blood
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / ethnology
  • Female
  • Glycated Hemoglobin / analysis
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Hispanic or Latino / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Pamphlets
  • Patient Education as Topic / methods*
  • Patient Participation / methods*
  • Poverty
  • Telemedicine

Substances

  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
  • Hypoglycemic Agents

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01427660