Increasing coverage and decreasing inequity in insecticide-treated bed net use among rural Kenyan children

PLoS Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):e255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040255.

Abstract

Background: Inexpensive and efficacious interventions that avert childhood deaths in sub-Saharan Africa have failed to reach effective coverage, especially among the poorest rural sectors. One particular example is insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs). In this study, we present repeat observations of ITN coverage among rural Kenyan homesteads exposed at different times to a range of delivery models, and assess changes in coverage across socioeconomic groups.

Methods and findings: We undertook a study of annual changes in ITN coverage among a cohort of 3,700 children aged 0-4 y in four districts of Kenya (Bondo, Greater Kisii, Kwale, and Makueni) annually between 2004 and 2006. Cross-sectional surveys of ITN coverage were undertaken coincidentally with the incremental availability of commercial sector nets (2004), the introduction of heavily subsidized nets through clinics (2005), and the introduction of free mass distributed ITNs (2006). The changing prevalence of ITN coverage was examined with special reference to the degree of equity in each delivery approach. ITN coverage was only 7.1% in 2004 when the predominant source of nets was the commercial retail sector. By the end of 2005, following the expansion of heavily subsidized clinic distribution system, ITN coverage rose to 23.5%. In 2006 a large-scale mass distribution of ITNs was mounted providing nets free of charge to children, resulting in a dramatic increase in ITN coverage to 67.3%. With each subsequent survey socioeconomic inequity in net coverage sequentially decreased: 2004 (most poor [2.9%] versus least poor [15.6%]; concentration index 0.281); 2005 (most poor [17.5%] versus least poor [37.9%]; concentration index 0.131), and 2006 with near-perfect equality (most poor [66.3%] versus least poor [66.6%]; concentration index 0.000). The free mass distribution method achieved highest coverage among the poorest children, the highly subsidised clinic nets programme was marginally in favour of the least poor, and the commercial social marketing favoured the least poor.

Conclusions: Rapid scaling up of ITN coverage among Africa's poorest rural children can be achieved through mass distribution campaigns. These efforts must form an important adjunct to regular, routine access to ITNs through clinics, and each complimentary approach should aim to make this intervention free to clients to ensure equitable access among those least able to afford even the cost of a heavily subsidized net.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Advertising
  • Bedding and Linens / economics
  • Bedding and Linens / statistics & numerical data*
  • Bedding and Linens / supply & distribution
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Data Collection
  • Female
  • Financing, Government
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Government Programs / economics
  • Government Programs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Insecticides*
  • International Cooperation
  • Kenya
  • Malaria / prevention & control
  • Male
  • Mosquito Control / economics
  • Mosquito Control / instrumentation*
  • Mosquito Control / statistics & numerical data
  • Poverty
  • Pregnancy
  • Program Evaluation / statistics & numerical data
  • Rural Population
  • Socioeconomic Factors

Substances

  • Insecticides