Can we afford to eliminate restenosis? Can we afford not to?

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.020.

Abstract

Over the past decade, coronary stenting has emerged as the dominant form of percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, bare metal stents remain limited by a high incidence of restenosis, leading to frequent repeat revascularization procedures and substantial economic burden. Antiproliferative drug-eluting stents (DES) have recently demonstrated dramatic reductions in rates of restenosis, compared with conventional stenting, but important concerns about their costs have been raised. In this article, we summarize current evidence on the economic impact of restenosis and explore the potential benefits and economic outcomes of DES. In addition to examining the long-term costs of this promising technology, we consider the potential cost-effectiveness of DES from a health care system perspective and the impact of specific patient, lesion, and provider characteristics on these parameters.

Publication types

  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Restenosis / economics*
  • Coronary Restenosis / prevention & control*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Diagnosis-Related Groups / economics
  • Drug Delivery Systems / economics*
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Medicare / economics
  • Prognosis
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stents / economics*
  • United States