ORIGINAL ARTICLEEffect of Magnetic vs Sham-Magnetic Insoles on Nonspecific Foot Pain in the Workplace: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Section snippets
Hypotheses and Study Design
The primary hypotheses of this study were that after wearing cushioned insoles for 4 and 8 weeks, participants who wore magnetic insoles as well as those who wore nonmagnetized (sham-magnetic) insoles would report a significant improvement (=2.5-cm reduction from their baseline visual analog scale [VAS] pain score) in intensity of average daily foot pain and that magnetic insoles would provide significantly greater categorical improvement in pain compared with sham-magnetic insoles. We
RESULTS
For this study, 89 participants were enrolled, 52 assigned to receive sham-magnetic insoles and 37 to receive magnetic insoles (Figure 1). Ages of study participants ranged from 19 to 73 years (mean, 44.3 years). Participants were primarily female (79%), with a median foot pain duration of 80 weeks (range, 6 weeks to >20 years). There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 intervention groups (Table 1). Symptomatic treatments at baseline did not differ
DISCUSSION
This study provides convincing evidence that use of static magnets for a total of 8 weeks was not effective in relieving symptoms of nonspecific foot pain in the workplace. The randomized, double-blind nature of this study was chosen to minimize bias and maximize the validity of results, and we are confident that this was accomplished. The sample size used and the absence of anything more than very small differences in outcomes when comparing active to sham magnets in this study make the
CONCLUSIONS
The static magnetic insoles studied were not clinically effective for treatment of chronic nonspecific foot pain. A moderate placebo effect was noted in participants who believed the strongest in the potential of magnets to help their pain. Nonspecific foot pain significantly interferes with some employees' ability to enjoy their jobs, and successful treatment of that pain improves job satisfaction.
REFERENCES (43)
Magnetotherapy: a new intervention? [letter]
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1998)- et al.
Pulsed magnetic field therapy for tibial non-union: interim results of a double-blind trial
Lancet
(1984) - et al.
Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis: a double-blind controlled assessment
Lancet
(1984) Electromagnetic fields and magnets: investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders
Rheum Dis Clin North Am
(2000)- et al.
Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2003) - et al.
Response of pain to static magnetic fields in postpolio patients: a double-blind pilot study
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1997) - et al.
Two configurations of static magnetic fields for treating rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: a double-blind clinical trial
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
Unconventional medicine in the United States: prevalence, costs, and patterns of use
N Engl J Med
(1993) - et al.
Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey
JAMA
(1998) A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1990)
The effect of repetitive magnetic stimulation on localized musculoskeletal pain
Neuroreport
Pain control using high-intensity pulsed magnetic stimulation
Bioelectromagnetics
The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine: report of randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials
J Rheumatol
The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation
J Rheumatol
Pulsed, non-thermal, high-frequency electromagnetic energy (Diapulse) in the treatment of grade I and grade II ankle sprains
Mil Med
Electromagnetic treatment of shoulder periarthritis: a randomized controlled trial of the efficiency and tolerance of magnetotherapy
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Chronic lateral humeral epicondylitis—a double-blind controlled assessment of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy
Clin Exp Rheumatol
Stress, pain, fatigue, depression—and magnets [editorial]
Stress Med
Magnet therapy
Sci Rev Altern Med
Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs
Bioelectromagnetics
Possible mechanism for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems
Bioelectromagnetics
Cited by (0)
This project was funded by an unrestricted educational grant from the Spenco Medical Corp, Waco, Tex. Spenco was not involved in any way in the study design, data collection, data analyses, or data interpretation or in manuscript preparation, review, or approval. Both the active and sham-magnetic insoles were provided at no charge directly from the manufacturer.
None of the authors have any affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this article.
Individual reprints of this article are not available.
- 1
Dr Billow is now with Northwest Orthopaedic Surgeons, Mount Vernon, Wash.