Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer, the second-leading cause of cancer-related mortality, is a preventable malignancy in many cases. Despite the availability of several screening modalities, compliance with screening recommendations remains unacceptably low. Virtual colonoscopy is a novel, minimally-invasive technique with the potential to increase colorectal cancer screening rates, but its effectiveness must first be validated. Published studies comparing virtual colonoscopy to conventional colonoscopy have reported varying results. These discrepancies may be attributed to differences in bowel preparation and scanning techniques, as well as errors in endoscopic lesion measurement, endoscopic colonic segmental localization, and the ability of conventional colonoscopy to actually detect lesions. These methodological issues can affect scientific results and ultimately affect the public’s perception of this emerging technique.
Aim: The goal of this report is to expose existing methodological shortcomings and propose solutions incorporated in this study design. This article describes the rationale, study design, and outcome definitions of a single-center, blinded, direct comparative trial aiming at assessing the ability of virtual colonoscopy to detect colorectal polyps and masses relative to the criterion standard, conventional colonoscopy.
Design Features: Bowel preparation was standardized using oral sodium phosphate lavage, orally administered iodinated contrast, and controlled colonic insufflation. Segmental unblinding allowed a second-look when results were discrepant and polyp matching was performed using an algorithm based on segmental localization and lesion size determination.
Conclusions: This methodology could be applied to other studies assessing the accuracy of virtual colonoscopy in order to have uniformity of results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmedin J, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:23–47.
Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale [errata in Gastroemterology 1997;112(3):1060 and 1998;114(3):625]. Gastroenterology 1997;112(2):594–642.
Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51(1):38–75.
Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89(19):1406–1422.
Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM, et al. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88(6):825–831.
Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Becthtold RE, Scharling ES, Grishaw EK, Shifrin RY. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [Abstract]. AJR 1994;162(suppl.), 104.
Hara AK, Johnson DC, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: Initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997;205:59–65.
Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001;219(3):685–692.
Rex DK, Vining DJ, Kopecky KK. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtnal colonoscopy) Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50(3):309–313.
Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [erratum in N Engl J Med 2000;342(7):524]. N Engl J Med 1999;341(20):1496–1503.
Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delative J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000;47(1):126–130.
Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000;216(3):704–711.
Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, Young JW, Cotton PB. Virtual endoscopy—comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy 2000;32(3):226–232.
Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy: Is it reality? Radiology 1996;200(1):30–31.
Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT. Virtual colonoscopy: what will the issues be? AJR 1997;169(2):453–458.
Vining DJ, Pineau BC. Improved bowel preparation for virtual colonoscopy examinations [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1999;116:524.
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112(1):24–28.
Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52(1):1–8.
Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS, Sampliner RE, Hixson LJ, Garewal HS. Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88(4):496–500.
Margulies C, Krevsky B, Catalano MF. How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size? Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40(2 Pt 1):174–177.
Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46(6):492–496.
Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U, Markert RJ, Peace N, Bhutani MS, et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46(6):497–502.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 1996;110:290–294.
Vakil N, Smith W, Bourgeois K, Everbach EC, Knyrim K. Endoscopic measurement of lesion size: improved accuracy with image processing. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40(2 Pt 1):178–183.
Vakil N. Measurement of lesions by endoscopy: an overview. Endoscopy 1995;27(9):694–697.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pineau, B.C., Paskett, E.D., Chen, G.J. et al. Validation of virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. Int J Gastrointest Canc 30, 133–140 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:30:3:133
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:30:3:133