Regular Article
Interobserver Variation in Interpretation of Arteriography and Management of Severe Lower Leg Arterial Disease

https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1328Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objective arteriography is the reference standard for the assessment of the lower leg arteries in patients with severe lower limb ischaemia. Interobserver variation in arteriography interpretation may cause disparities with non-invasive imaging modalities. We determined interobserver variation in lower leg artery assessment with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IaDSA) and subsequent patient management. Materials iaDSA studies of patients evaluated for severe claudication (n =5) or critical ischaemia ( n =43). Methods arteriograms were independently judged by four observers. The popliteal and tibial arteries were graded as fully patent, severely diseased, occluded or non-diagnostic. The dorsalis pedis, common and deep plantar artery were graded as directly, indirectly or not filling the pedal arch or non-diagnostic. Agreement on grading arteries was expressed as κ-values. Treatment plans (conservative, PTA, surgery, amputation, non-diagnostic) proposed by each observer based on clinical information and iaDSA were compared. Results the rate of non-diagnostic judgements ranged from 1% in the popliteal to 22% in the pedal arteries. Overall agreement was good for grading the popliteal arteries (κ=0.64), moderate for the tibial (κ=0.47–0.54) and fair for the pedal arteries (κ=0.39). Agreement was good to excellent for grading occluded or fully patent popliteal and tibial artery segments, and fair to moderate for grading severe disease. In 57% of cases at least 3 observers proposed identical treatment, which indicates fair overall agreement (κ=0.33). Conclusion interobserver agreement on iaDSA is good to determine occluded or fully patent popliteal or tibial arteries, but not for severe disease. This should be taken into account when other diagnostic modalities are compared with iaDSA. Evaluation of diagnostic modalities as concordance in treatment plans is flawed by interindividual variation.

Keywords

Arteriography
Interobserver variation
Arterial disease
Patient management.

Cited by (0)

Please address all correspondence to: D. A. Legemate, Department of Surgery, G4-111, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.